ACLU says prisons not complying with court order

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal judge has ordered the Indiana Department of Correction to come to her courtroom Wednesday and explain its "precise plans" for improving the treatment of mentally ill prisoners after the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana argued the state doesn't seem to be taking the situation seriously.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt scheduled a hearing for Wednesday and told DOC attorneys to explain what the agency was doing to comply with the order she issued on Dec. 31. That was when she found prison agency's treatment of the nearly 6,000 mentally ill inmates in the system was inadequate, and ordered it to do more.

The ACLU represented the state Protection and Advocacy Services Commission in the class action lawsuit that was filed in 2008. The commission advocates for the rights of the disabled.

Pratt ruled that by simply locking mentally ill prisoners up in their cells without adequate treatment, the state system was violating the inmates' constitutional right against cruel and unusual punishment.

In a report both sides filed with the court in April, the prison agency said it was exploring options including increasing staff and space for care, perhaps at the Pendleton Correctional Facility, but cost estimates had been higher than expected. It said the changes would be phased in over several years. The report did not cite a figure for the cost.

"However, at this point the plan appears to be largely aspirational," ACLU legal director Ken Falk said in a motion a filed last month. It said the DOC's last report "has no detail whatsoever about the plan."

Kara Brooks, a spokeswoman for Gov. Mike Pence, referred questions to the Department of Correction, which had no comment. The attorney general's office, which defends state agencies in court, had no comment beyond providing court documents.

About a quarter of the inmates in the Indiana Department of Correction are mentally ill, but the state's two mental health units have room for only about 250 patients.

Advocates say the number of mentally ill people in prison has risen over the years as states have cut budgets for treatment.

Josh Sprunger, executive director for the Indiana chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness, said many mentally ill people end up in prison because they can't get treatment outside, either because they can't afford it or it just isn't available. Sprunger estimated that about 300,000 people in Indiana have serious mental illnesses like schizophrenia or post-traumatic stress disorder, but only about half of them are able to get treatment.

"If they can't afford it, they're doing without anything. They're going to ERs the most part if they can get there," Sprunger said. Many, he said, loop through homelessness, emergency rooms and prison or jails, and then end up back out on the street to begin the cycle all over again.


  • Not Suing Yourself
    Scott -- I've never understood why people that don't understand what's happening choose to show off their lack of understanding and make comments. This case was brought by IPAS and the ACLU because some people in the State of Indiana think that even people that are in jail deserve to be treated like human beings. Yes we cage them like animals but taking a people with PTSD, schizophrenia and a number of other mental health disorders that cause them to "act out" (or seem crazy)and putting them under more and more stressful stiuations like endless solitary confinement, makes the situation worse for everyone involved (prison guards, other prisoners and the inmate). The jails that are now understaffed, underpaid and subcontracted to the lowest bidder have basically told the people of Indiana: "if your love ones are in here... to bad for them" which is not the way we treat each other in this country. If you want that style of justice... visit Mexico.
  • Aspirational...
    I do like the ACLU's Falk referring to the DOC plans as "largely aspirational", meaning that they have "good intentions", but have not actually done anything, other than get a cost estimate aboout the plans which they say is higher than they expected...but they don't report how much the estimates were...hmmm...I don't wonder how this has ended up back in front of the Judge.
  • I'm Suing Myself!
    So the State of Indiana, via IPAS, got the ACLU to sue the State of Indiana, via DOC? Is it just me, or does this seem a little...ridiculous? Locking up prisoners in their cells is a violation of constitutional rights? Oh, they're mentally ill...that makes it okay then. Things like this make me want to leave Indiana.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ