IBJNews

Airport ready to embark on redevelopment plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis Airport Authority CEO John Clark revealed Tuesday evening that he is ready to proceed with a plan that could transform the airport's former terminal site into a hub for urban development.

Speaking to members of the City-County Council’s Municipal Corporations Committee, Clark said he will ask the Indianapolis Airport Authority board at its Friday meeting to approve hiring a team of consultants to work on the study.

The aim of the plan, which the consultants would finish by year’s end, is to identify what types of development might best complement the airport’s new, $1.1 billion terminal, which opened in late 2008.

Clark declined to divulge which consultants are under consideration, or how much it might cost to complete the plan. But he said a combination of firms likely would be hired that separately would study different areas of development, such as commercial, residential, aviation and transportation.

Since August, the authority has received 14 responses to a national request for information from firms interesting in evaluating the airport property and recommending what to do with it.

Clark said the airport will hire John D. Kasarda, a professor of management and director of the Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise at the University of North Carolina, to advise the authority as the redevelopment plan moves forward.

Kasarda, who has worked with airports around the world, is a proponent of what is known as “Aerotropolis,” an airport city with well-planned outlying corridors and clusters of aviation-linked business and residential development. He presented the concept to the authority last month.

Successful implementation of an Aerotropolis requires integrated planning with other government and community entities outside the airport.

Clark said local economic development organizations and Hendricks County officials have been included in the process. The large distribution centers that have popped up near the airport in the neighboring county are a direct result of the airport, he said.

Other cities, such as Memphis, Denver and Dallas-Fort Worth, also are embarking on the “Aerotropolis” concept.

But Indianapolis already has several advantages, such as a number of large plots of land, good road connectivity and big commercial facilities at the airport, such as FedEx’s No. 2 U.S. package hub.

The biggest motivation to develop the airport’s 8,000 acres is to create an alternative source of revenue, Clark said.  

The authority earlier this year projected a $15 million budget shortfall, blaming the recession. With fewer passenger and cargo flights, the authority now collects millions less in landing fees, parking revenue and concession income.

Further, the authority this year began paying on the $40 million in annual debt service on the new terminal, at a time when passenger boardings are down 11 percent year-to-date over the same time last year.

“Passenger airports are very dependent on the people that come through those terminals,” Clark said. “That model has to be modified. We’ve got to find other ways to generate revenue.”

Council committee members largely were receptive to the plan. Republican Robert Lutz, who represents the 13th District directly north of the airport, said he’s pleased the process is beginning.

“That was my frustration; there was no plan,” he said. “I like this concept of where we should be in 40 to 50 years.”

Clark urged patience with the plan, saying the authority only has one chance “to do it right.”

“We’re really excited about this,” he said. “It’s not too often that you have an airport that is not already encumbered and landlocked.”

A steering committee consisting of 25 to 50 people who have a stake in the development will be formed to get additional public input, Clark said.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • me likey
    hear hear thundermutt!

    Not sure this would make sense however it would be nice if they were consider moving the Central Post Office out there too.
  • Over specialized
    Airports are so specialized for their use that they are practically useless for anything else. Mark's idea for a light stream of funds before we must tear down the terminal may actually not be a bad idea. I know detroit has focused on bringing in more hollywood films and it has been working great for them. Although it would be nice to have a large source of housing and entertainment next to the airport the people most interested in this project will be international businesses. The idea on moving the criminal courts is fantastic, but not to the airport.
    This will likely be turned into a slightly more welcome version of what is on west of the airport. It would be filled with offices and distribution centers along with a couple hotels, dining establishments and maybe a few specialized stores like staples, fedex office, and such.
  • Entertainment
    It would really be nice if they would consider a Metropolis or Aerotropolis entertainment district...on a very large scale....food, retail, hotel, etc....
  • Mass Transit & Movie Set
    Both of these are excellent ideas!!!
  • Move the jails
    Move the police, criminal courts and jails to the old terminal building, in conjunction with the east-west rail line. That gets the three jail facilities out of the Market Square neighborhood and makes redevelopment there far more doable.

    Since there's plenty of parking in those humongous garages and surface lots, access shouldn't be any problem...and the place is already set up to deal with security.
    • Think Hub
      The old facility provides an excellent opportunity to become a mass transportation hub. Any plan developed needs to be in conjunction with the Indyconnect plan recently announced. This city need mass transit desparatly. By making the old airport a hub, the parking and hotels are already in place, the hotel rooms are there and ready. The next phase should be first bring rail transit to the facility, the develop the supporting retail around that. Use what ya got first, then spend more money, but let's not re-invent the wheel.
    • Movie Set
      Perhaps the Airport Authority could rent the terminal building out to Hollywood for the time being until a more tangible idea takes form.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Members must realize if you stop paying your dues you will lose. Why else would your employer honor the rtw bill. Before you take this step think about what you may be giving up in the long run. Very little of your dues money goes to any dem candidate. YOu will never know how much your republican employer gives his party with money he could be paying the employee. Who will step up and demand better wages or benefits if you have no representation. Union is the way for a better life. Our carpenter union offers a 4 year apprenticeship and 2 year degree from Ivy Tech all paid for with union dues . This is a great opportunity for kids who cant afford schooling after high school. The same opportunity is there for any person,any age, either sex to provide a better living for their family. Pension, anuity, health insurance all for your dues. How is this a bad choice.

    2. The FDIC is funded by assessments paid by banks, not taxpayers. That is not to say that bank customers don't ultimately pay the cost because, in the end, banks don't survive if they don't make profits.

    3. SCB Bank's failure is expected to cost the government $33.9 million,dont you mean middle class another bailout our government has no money

    4. Diogenes, the company did not call "pro-life" statements inflammatory. The IBJ article used the words "pro life."

      All, the company did, is what it should do which is apologize profusely for offending people with a program that offered statements that support an infamous apartheid proponent, Dr. Verwoerd, suggest that sometimes rape is justified, and quote Biblical text to people, not looking for it.

      If this is what you think is "insanity" then more companies need to behave insanely.

    5. I totally disagree with $45mil being given to the state Attorney General's office. That money is a waste. All of the money should go to help the homeowners & the people who were foreclosed on. Why such a big percentage to state govt? They'll get to start another agency staffed with people who have new-found power & don't care about the people they serve. As soon as the program was announced, I knew the states would end up with a huge chunk of the money for themselves that would just be squandered. Or maybe Mitch Daniels will just happen to "find" another big chunk of money that was "posted in the wrong section of the state's books."

    ADVERTISEMENT