IBJNews

Airport ready to embark on redevelopment plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Airport Authority CEO John Clark revealed Tuesday evening that he is ready to proceed with a plan that could transform the airport's former terminal site into a hub for urban development.

Speaking to members of the City-County Council’s Municipal Corporations Committee, Clark said he will ask the Indianapolis Airport Authority board at its Friday meeting to approve hiring a team of consultants to work on the study.

The aim of the plan, which the consultants would finish by year’s end, is to identify what types of development might best complement the airport’s new, $1.1 billion terminal, which opened in late 2008.

Clark declined to divulge which consultants are under consideration, or how much it might cost to complete the plan. But he said a combination of firms likely would be hired that separately would study different areas of development, such as commercial, residential, aviation and transportation.

Since August, the authority has received 14 responses to a national request for information from firms interesting in evaluating the airport property and recommending what to do with it.

Clark said the airport will hire John D. Kasarda, a professor of management and director of the Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise at the University of North Carolina, to advise the authority as the redevelopment plan moves forward.

Kasarda, who has worked with airports around the world, is a proponent of what is known as “Aerotropolis,” an airport city with well-planned outlying corridors and clusters of aviation-linked business and residential development. He presented the concept to the authority last month.

Successful implementation of an Aerotropolis requires integrated planning with other government and community entities outside the airport.

Clark said local economic development organizations and Hendricks County officials have been included in the process. The large distribution centers that have popped up near the airport in the neighboring county are a direct result of the airport, he said.

Other cities, such as Memphis, Denver and Dallas-Fort Worth, also are embarking on the “Aerotropolis” concept.

But Indianapolis already has several advantages, such as a number of large plots of land, good road connectivity and big commercial facilities at the airport, such as FedEx’s No. 2 U.S. package hub.

The biggest motivation to develop the airport’s 8,000 acres is to create an alternative source of revenue, Clark said.  

The authority earlier this year projected a $15 million budget shortfall, blaming the recession. With fewer passenger and cargo flights, the authority now collects millions less in landing fees, parking revenue and concession income.

Further, the authority this year began paying on the $40 million in annual debt service on the new terminal, at a time when passenger boardings are down 11 percent year-to-date over the same time last year.

“Passenger airports are very dependent on the people that come through those terminals,” Clark said. “That model has to be modified. We’ve got to find other ways to generate revenue.”

Council committee members largely were receptive to the plan. Republican Robert Lutz, who represents the 13th District directly north of the airport, said he’s pleased the process is beginning.

“That was my frustration; there was no plan,” he said. “I like this concept of where we should be in 40 to 50 years.”

Clark urged patience with the plan, saying the authority only has one chance “to do it right.”

“We’re really excited about this,” he said. “It’s not too often that you have an airport that is not already encumbered and landlocked.”

A steering committee consisting of 25 to 50 people who have a stake in the development will be formed to get additional public input, Clark said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • me likey
    hear hear thundermutt!

    Not sure this would make sense however it would be nice if they were consider moving the Central Post Office out there too.
  • Over specialized
    Airports are so specialized for their use that they are practically useless for anything else. Mark's idea for a light stream of funds before we must tear down the terminal may actually not be a bad idea. I know detroit has focused on bringing in more hollywood films and it has been working great for them. Although it would be nice to have a large source of housing and entertainment next to the airport the people most interested in this project will be international businesses. The idea on moving the criminal courts is fantastic, but not to the airport.
    This will likely be turned into a slightly more welcome version of what is on west of the airport. It would be filled with offices and distribution centers along with a couple hotels, dining establishments and maybe a few specialized stores like staples, fedex office, and such.
  • Entertainment
    It would really be nice if they would consider a Metropolis or Aerotropolis entertainment district...on a very large scale....food, retail, hotel, etc....
  • Mass Transit & Movie Set
    Both of these are excellent ideas!!!
  • Move the jails
    Move the police, criminal courts and jails to the old terminal building, in conjunction with the east-west rail line. That gets the three jail facilities out of the Market Square neighborhood and makes redevelopment there far more doable.

    Since there's plenty of parking in those humongous garages and surface lots, access shouldn't be any problem...and the place is already set up to deal with security.
    • Think Hub
      The old facility provides an excellent opportunity to become a mass transportation hub. Any plan developed needs to be in conjunction with the Indyconnect plan recently announced. This city need mass transit desparatly. By making the old airport a hub, the parking and hotels are already in place, the hotel rooms are there and ready. The next phase should be first bring rail transit to the facility, the develop the supporting retail around that. Use what ya got first, then spend more money, but let's not re-invent the wheel.
    • Movie Set
      Perhaps the Airport Authority could rent the terminal building out to Hollywood for the time being until a more tangible idea takes form.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

    2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

    3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

    4. Exciting times in Carmel.

    5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

    ADVERTISEMENT