IBJNews

Anderson eyes improvements to I-69 corridors

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Improvements to two major corridors from Interstate 69 to downtown Anderson, reconfigurations of complicated interchanges, and changing one-way streets to two-way streets are among Mayor Kevin Smith's goals.

And he is excited about what those improvements could mean for the city and downtown businesses.

Smith said that the two main corridors to downtown — routes from I-69 exits 22 and 26 — need to be aesthetically pleasing and easy to navigate for visitors and potential investors.

The mayor doesn't have a set timeline, design or price tag for most of the improvements, so those are projects his engineering department will be undertaking.

The first corridor, which is the closest for people coming from Indianapolis and Hamilton County, goes from Exit 22, follows Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and connects to Jackson Street through 17th Street. Jackson Street moves drivers into downtown.

Smith said he would like to continue making aesthetic upgrades that were begun during his first term as mayor, between January 2004 and December 2007. Among those projects was the addition of a series of red light poles along a section of MLK Boulevard to trademark the area as the Speedway district.

"We actively demolished (half a dozen) abandoned or vacant properties along the corridor and replanted them with vegetation and trees," Smith said.

"Our product to sell is Anderson, Ind. Our goal was to make that travel through there much more pleasing to the eye. We are also operating on the basis that it is more likely to attract new investment to the city."

The second corridor starts off Exit 26, goes north on Scatterfield Road, west on Mounds Road, merges with Ohio Avenue and then continues along Cincinnati Avenue. The corridor curves to the west until it reaches downtown.

Along that route there are two intersections that are problematic, Smith said, and he would like to change that.

Each intersection has three roads coming together in one spot, making things confusing for drivers, especially for visitors who are trying to get in and out of town, Smith said. And to make things worse, the two intersections are side-by-side.

Those interchanges include 18th Street, Huey Street and Columbus Avenue, and to the east of that, East Lynn Street, 18th Street and Ohio Avenue.

A new design hasn't been determined, but Smith would like to make some changes so the Exit 26 corridor is more navigable.

"Those are two intersections that will be a challenge to redesign because they are so close to the railroad," Smith said.

And Smith also wants to make sure that once drivers have made it downtown through the improved corridors that they also can move around there easily.

He believes that all the one-way streets can confuse drivers and make them go out of their way when coming in and out of downtown. He would like most of the streets to become two-way roads so people can more directly reach the business they are looking for and then can leave on the same roads they drove in on.

"A logical resolution that has been discussed before, and bears even greater discussion now is having the core of the city in a two-way street configuration, while allowing two outside corridors, one for north traffic and one for south, to bypass the downtown," Smith said.

Smith said that the one-way northbound street would be Central Avenue, and the southbound street would be Brown-Delaware. The rest would become two-way streets.

"This would facilitate people wanting to navigate the core downtown rather than navigate multiple blocks," he said. "There is not only the business-friendly issue, but this is also a green initiative. We want to make destination points much easier to access and you don't have to run your car motor as much."

The city and a group of residents and business owners are creating a committee that will further discuss what can be done to help improve downtown and draw more visitors, business and investors to downtown. The group will hold its first meeting later this month.

Kyle Morey, president of the Madison County Chamber of Commerce, said the corridor and street improvements could be beneficial to downtown businesses.

"It is our opinion that it is a great improvement for commerce any time you can have roads that are prepared to connect traffic to commerce," he said. "It will be better for businesses any time you can improve transportation opportunities and the flow of traffic. Plus it gets things moving forward again and gets people working on the road projects."

Once the city gets a better idea of the intersection designs and aesthetic improvements it wants to make, it can seek federal funding.

As far as local funding, that will be another hurdle for the city, Smith said. He had been hoping to use funds from the wheel tax, but was disappointed when the Madison County Council voted last week to rescind the tax.

"If we want to continue to grow aesthetically and culturally and dynamically, we will have to be even more reliant on outside funding strings that might be available," he said. "Some of these upgrades are essential to the viability and competitiveness of the city."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ugly I 69
    The improvement to the I69 corridor has come and gone. Drive 69 through Madison County/Anderson every week. With miles of billboards of every size,height,setback not sure anything they do will make the experience of visiting Anderson ever a pleasant experience.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT