IBJNews

Anthem not quite so dominant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After adjustments by the Indiana Department of Insurance, it appears Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield isn’t quite so dominant in the individual insurance market as previously reported—but it also stands to gain as two of the six largest plans pull back.

The Insurance Department filed updated numbers in an Aug. 10 letter to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The latest figures, based on revised and late filings from the companies, show that Indianapolis-based Anthem covers 59.6 percent of Hoosiers who have individual health insurance policies.

Insurance department data from 2010 showed Anthem covering 65 percent of Hoosiers on individual insurance policies.

Anthem’s nearest competitor, Minnesota-based UnitedHealthcare and its Indianapolis-based subsidiary Golden Rule, cover 15.6 percent of the individual market.

Rounding out the top six are: Time Insurance Co., a subsidiary of Milwaukee-based Assurant Inc., with 7 percent of the market; Texas-based Mega Life & Health Insurance Co., with 2.4 percent; and Louisville-based Humana Insurance Co., with 2.1 percent, and Illinois-based Pekin Life Insurance Co.

Pekin has withdrawn from Indiana. And Mega stopped marketing new health insurance policies in the state as of June 7, according to the Insurance Department.

No other company claims more than 2 percent of lives covered by individual policies in Indiana.

Five health insurers, including Pekin and giants Cigna Corp. and Aetna Inc., have announced their exit from the Indiana individual health insurance market. Their main complaint is the new rule instituted by the federal health reform law requiring them to spend 80 percent of premiums on medical bills.

Many insurers are below that threshold and would have to rebate the difference to their customers. If the rule had been in effect last year, Indiana health insurers would have handed out rebates to individual customers totaling $30.5 million, according to Insurance Department data.

Anthem is pretty close to the mark. It spent 76.6 percent of its individual policy premiums on medical bills last year, according to Insurance Department data. If the 80-percent rule had been in effect, Anthem would have paid $9.3 million.

Anthem spokesman Tony Felts said the company does not anticipate having to pay rebates based on this year’s business trends.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT