IBJNews

Anthem not quite so dominant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After adjustments by the Indiana Department of Insurance, it appears Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield isn’t quite so dominant in the individual insurance market as previously reported—but it also stands to gain as two of the six largest plans pull back.

The Insurance Department filed updated numbers in an Aug. 10 letter to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The latest figures, based on revised and late filings from the companies, show that Indianapolis-based Anthem covers 59.6 percent of Hoosiers who have individual health insurance policies.

Insurance department data from 2010 showed Anthem covering 65 percent of Hoosiers on individual insurance policies.

Anthem’s nearest competitor, Minnesota-based UnitedHealthcare and its Indianapolis-based subsidiary Golden Rule, cover 15.6 percent of the individual market.

Rounding out the top six are: Time Insurance Co., a subsidiary of Milwaukee-based Assurant Inc., with 7 percent of the market; Texas-based Mega Life & Health Insurance Co., with 2.4 percent; and Louisville-based Humana Insurance Co., with 2.1 percent, and Illinois-based Pekin Life Insurance Co.

Pekin has withdrawn from Indiana. And Mega stopped marketing new health insurance policies in the state as of June 7, according to the Insurance Department.

No other company claims more than 2 percent of lives covered by individual policies in Indiana.

Five health insurers, including Pekin and giants Cigna Corp. and Aetna Inc., have announced their exit from the Indiana individual health insurance market. Their main complaint is the new rule instituted by the federal health reform law requiring them to spend 80 percent of premiums on medical bills.

Many insurers are below that threshold and would have to rebate the difference to their customers. If the rule had been in effect last year, Indiana health insurers would have handed out rebates to individual customers totaling $30.5 million, according to Insurance Department data.

Anthem is pretty close to the mark. It spent 76.6 percent of its individual policy premiums on medical bills last year, according to Insurance Department data. If the 80-percent rule had been in effect, Anthem would have paid $9.3 million.

Anthem spokesman Tony Felts said the company does not anticipate having to pay rebates based on this year’s business trends.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT