IBJNews

Anthem not quite so dominant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After adjustments by the Indiana Department of Insurance, it appears Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield isn’t quite so dominant in the individual insurance market as previously reported—but it also stands to gain as two of the six largest plans pull back.

The Insurance Department filed updated numbers in an Aug. 10 letter to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The latest figures, based on revised and late filings from the companies, show that Indianapolis-based Anthem covers 59.6 percent of Hoosiers who have individual health insurance policies.

Insurance department data from 2010 showed Anthem covering 65 percent of Hoosiers on individual insurance policies.

Anthem’s nearest competitor, Minnesota-based UnitedHealthcare and its Indianapolis-based subsidiary Golden Rule, cover 15.6 percent of the individual market.

Rounding out the top six are: Time Insurance Co., a subsidiary of Milwaukee-based Assurant Inc., with 7 percent of the market; Texas-based Mega Life & Health Insurance Co., with 2.4 percent; and Louisville-based Humana Insurance Co., with 2.1 percent, and Illinois-based Pekin Life Insurance Co.

Pekin has withdrawn from Indiana. And Mega stopped marketing new health insurance policies in the state as of June 7, according to the Insurance Department.

No other company claims more than 2 percent of lives covered by individual policies in Indiana.

Five health insurers, including Pekin and giants Cigna Corp. and Aetna Inc., have announced their exit from the Indiana individual health insurance market. Their main complaint is the new rule instituted by the federal health reform law requiring them to spend 80 percent of premiums on medical bills.

Many insurers are below that threshold and would have to rebate the difference to their customers. If the rule had been in effect last year, Indiana health insurers would have handed out rebates to individual customers totaling $30.5 million, according to Insurance Department data.

Anthem is pretty close to the mark. It spent 76.6 percent of its individual policy premiums on medical bills last year, according to Insurance Department data. If the 80-percent rule had been in effect, Anthem would have paid $9.3 million.

Anthem spokesman Tony Felts said the company does not anticipate having to pay rebates based on this year’s business trends.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT