IBJNews

WellPoint insures two-thirds of Hoosier workers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

If you’re an Indiana employer looking to actually buy health insurance—as opposed to insuring yourself—odds are 2-to-1 that you’ll find your way to WellPoint Inc. and its Anthem subsidiary.

Indianapolis-based WellPoint insured 63 percent of all employees covered by small-group employers (those with fewer than 50 workers) and 66 percent of the workers at larger employers, according to Seattle-based actuarial firm Milliman Inc., which based its calculations on 2010 information from Massachusetts-based Highline Data.

WellPoint also insured 65 percent of all Hoosiers buying individual coverage at year-end 2010.

The numbers were part of a July 13 presentation by Seema Verma, a consultant for the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration who is spearheading efforts to prepare the state for health care reform requirements, most of which hit in 2014.

Perhaps because of Anthem’s dominance, relatively few Indiana employers actually buy full health insurance coverage, according to Milliman. Most insure themselves, then hire Anthem, Cigna, UnitedHealthcare or some other third-party administrator to negotiate discounts with doctors and to process claims.

Among the 3.6 million workers in Indiana covered by employer-sponsored health insurance, only 22 percent have full insurance from a health insurance company.

The remaining 78 percent are technically insured by the employer itself, with some other company providing administration services only.

That percentage is significantly higher than national averages. According to a 2010 employer survey by California-based Kaiser Family Foundation, 59 percent of workers with health benefits are covered by self-insured employers. That percentage has risen from 52 percent in 2003.

Employers in Indiana provide health insurance coverage to 56 percent of the state’s 6.4 million people. The rest are covered by Medicare or other public programs, or by health insurance they pay for entirely themselves, or are uninsured.

Data showing WellPoint’s dominance of the commercial health insurance market in Indiana are not new, but the numbers presented by the state government are higher than any put out previously.

In January, IBJ published market share data for the commercial market from Tennessee-based HealthLeaders-InterStudy. It showed WellPoint had 53 percent of the market, which includes all employers—both fully insured and self-insured—as well as individual customers.

WellPoint officials claimed the numbers were too high, but declined to provide a corrected figure.

“That number seems inflated to us,” WellPoint spokesman Tony Felts said. “It’s higher than anything we’ve ever seen.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • “That number seems inflated to us”
    ...WellPoint spokesman Tony Felts said. “It’s higher than anything we’ve ever seen.”

    of course they HATE to admit they have a near monopoly cuz it would ruin that whole 'free market' thing which makes crony capitalism work SO well (at least for them, for people who want affordable health insurance, not so much) Anthem doesn't care about ANYTHING but the almighty $$$...it's what they do it's who they are

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT