IBJNews

Environmental groups sue to block I-69 construction

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Environmentalists have filed a lawsuit aimed at stopping construction of the Interstate 69 extension in southern Indiana, claiming the project violates federal environmental laws.

Landowners affected by the I-69 project, Citizens for Appropriate Rural Roads and the I-69 Accountability Project filed the suit in federal court in Indianapolis on Monday, a week after federal highway officials signed off on the final environmental review for the stretch from the Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center to Bloomington.

The groups contend that the highway project threatens the endangered Indiana bat and violates the federal Endangered Species Act.

A spokesman for Citizens for Appropriate Rural Roads said the group believes the state highway department underestimated in its count of nearly 1,500 geologic features such as sinkholes, caves and springs in the path of the latest approved section.

"I-69 should never have been routed through this extremely environmentally sensitive area," Thomas Tokarski said.

Indiana Department of Transportation spokeswoman Cher Elliott told The Herald-Times of Bloomington that the agency has "followed all state and federal guidelines" regarding the project.

Construction began in 2009 near Evansville on the first section of the planned 142-mile route between that city and Indianapolis. The project has been estimated to cost about $3 billion to complete.

In February, the Hoosier Environmental Council and Citizens for Appropriate Rural Roads filed a lawsuit claiming the Army Corps of Engineers violated federal law by giving the state permission to fill wetlands and reroute streams along the I-69 route in Greene and Daviess counties.

That lawsuit, which is still pending in federal court, asked that the highway be rerouted to a less environmentally disruptive route along existing highways, U.S. 41 and Interstate 70.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • i 69
    Would you people stop complaining...
  • Wrong Problem
    Tom, your reasoning presents either a mode issue or a location issue. If so many people in bloomington need to get to Indy, or Indy to Bloomington or Indy to Evansville or whatever, then maybe they should live in these places instead of having me pay for their commute or perhaps we would be better served by a higher occupancy vehicle to transport them from place to place.
  • Me
    This is a Washington DC environmental firm that has limited local support. Don't get catch up in the language.
  • SIGH
    As I pointed out to the misguided citizens of Bloomington, I-69 is needed now, just as the previous project that widened SR 37 from Indianapolis to Bloomington was needed. Order of magnitude improvement in travel time. the US-41/I-70 routing INCREASES travel time over the more direct route. I checked the SR 37 routes Indy to Bloomington, and discovered that Old SR 37 is actually a bit shorter, but takes over twice as long! The same will happen with I-69 from Evansville to Indy - via US41/I-70 will take LONGER than I-69 via Bloomington. In this case, the two routes would be otherwise equal, but via Bloomington will be shorter, and hence quicker, than via Terre Haute. And everyone's already signed off on it - EPA included. So, give it up, already!
  • NAFTA
    The Highway from Mexico to Canada is to help the free trade between Canada, the US, and Mexico. So far I am wondering how anyone has been helped by NAFTA.
  • Pay Attention
    These environmental concerns were raised very early in the process, but officials were determined to disregard what grassroots people had to say and do as they darn well pleased. So here we are, many years later and many dollars spent later, and these same issues are still being raised. Let there be a lesson here: Behaving like a bully by failing to truly listen and thoughtfully address people's concerns means that time and money end up being wasted.
  • Sunk Cost
    Jeff, I have to agree with Joe. Spending $3 Billion so that we don't waste $10 Million is a fallacy of Sunk Cost logic.
  • Misguided
    Jeff, Citing money spent as a reason to continue spending money is a terrible reasoning. The US government obviously invested a lot of money in things, yet we just spent months and many news stories arguing how they should reduce spending and cut programs. Because you dug a hole doesn't mean you need to dig deeper to justify it.
  • Wrong Direction
    No, you cannot sue for ingnorant fiscal policy. The wheels to construct I-69 from Indy to E'ville was started under Bayh and continued under O'Bannon, Kernan and Daniels. Support for this interstate was bi-partisan and part of an overall Federal plan to extend the interstate from Canada to Mexico. To waste all the money spent on studies from the late 90s to date would be a total travesty and complete waste of taxpayer money. Now, that investment and work is paying for persons who would otherwise be unemployed or under-employed.
  • Wrong Direction
    Can we sue for ignorant fiscal policy?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

ADVERTISEMENT