ExactTarget stock sluggish 1 year after IPO, but analysts bullish

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A year after email marketer ExactTarget Inc.'s $161 million initial public offering, the stock hasn't gained the momentum analysts expected.

The shares closed Thursday at $22.76, better than the $19 at the initial public offering, but well below the $25.11 reached before the end of the first day of trading. The price slipped to $20 in June and has hovered in the high teens to low 20s since.

But all 12 stock market analysts following the company maintain their optimism, citing ExactTarget's record $292.2 million revenue in 2012, $22.7 million cash flow, $116.5 million spent on acquisitions, and $54 million invested in research and development.

Seven analysts have “buy” recommendations for the company and five are “strong buy.” On average, they forecast $31.67 per share within a year.

“ExactTarget is a well-managed company, growing at hyper rates, but we often get push back from investors who question the sustainability of e-mail marketing, where the largest portion of the company’s revenue comes from,” JPMorgan analyst John DiFucci wrote in a note to investors.

Competitors exacerbated concerns about the industry because of their own technological or execution problems, DiFucci continued: “On the contrary, we remind investors that e-mail marketing alone is a very large market of about $5.5 billion today [including transactional e-mails], growing at close to 20 percent a year—and this is likely to be the case for the next several years.”

Jeff Houston, an analyst for Barrington Research, said previous market reports—projections of 10 percent to 12 percent industry-wide growth in e-mail marketing—have confused investors because they did not include key points that are critical for ExactTarget.

The lower estimates don’t include international e-mails or “transaction-type e-mails,” such as banks alerting customers about account overdrafts. The projections also missed ExactTarget’s growing base of non-e-mail marketing products, Houston said, which the company anticipates accounting for 20 percent of its business in 2013.

Despite the bullishness on Wall Street, profitability has evaded ExactTarget since 2008.

Expenses tied to the company’s growth strategy let to a $21 million net loss last year.

During a Feb. 21 conference call with reporters, Chairman and CEO Scott Dorsey noted ExactTarget’s hefty investments last year as it reached into foreign countries, added to its portfolio of services and increased employment from 1,133 to 1,673.

The willingness to spend more now than its competitors will push ExactTarget ahead in the future, RBC Capital Markets analyst Robert Breza said in a March 12 note to investors.

“The company currently spends [approximately three to four times] the dollars on research and development, products, and infrastructure versus its nearest competitor,” Breza wrote. “We believe this has created a significant barrier to entry and leaves competitors in the position of having to play catch-up.”

Also, ExactTarget dipped into its IPO proceeds and bought two companies: marketing automation firm Pardot LLC for $95.5 million and “predictive analytics” provider iGoDigital for $21 million.


  • New Media, eh?
    You wish them well but you post your personal opinions like this in the IBJ comments? You sure have a weird way of showing encouragement. I sure wouldn't want to be your friend knowing you are posting these comments on such a place as this. Maybe rant from your own site like usual?
  • New Media
    Within a week of one another, I heard 3 speakers from ExactTarget knock other marketing channels. One spoke of mobile app fatigue (while there are more apps born every day than human beings) and the others said that you can't do social if you don't do email. Another one spoke to the success of social media BECAUSE of email. All three of these are alarming remarks and show some hubris on the side of the company. ExactTarget swallowed Cotweet and we've not seen any innovation since. With the advent of mobile, social, video, HTML5 and other technologies, I fear that ExactTarget is standing high upon a hill in its castle and not seeing the enemies at the gate. There are plenty of competitors in their space - and money is being spread through other marketing mediums. If ExactTarget doesn't expand its offerings into other channels ... or at minimum stop knocking them... I fear for their future. It's also disconcerting that much smaller players in the space have already made the move to mobile and tablet with great applications. I look forward to seeing more from my friends at ExactTarget, they're a top notch sales organization and their service is tops in the industry. Mr. Dorsey is unique among all public CEOs in that he's grown a company from 3 to an international email powerhouse. I wish them well.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.