Local 3D firm develops printer-based curriculum

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Business owner Kim Brand posed a question to a crowd of mostly elderly listeners.

“They all laughed when I said, ‘How many of you took shop classes?’ They all raised their hands,” Brand said. “I said, ‘How many of you have grandkids who are in shop classes?’ Nobody raised their hands. Nobody. We’ve abandoned what I think is a sort of deep, DNA capacity to tinker.”

Brand’s Indianapolis-based company, 3D Parts Manufacturing, responded to a lack of interest in engineering and manufacturing by working with Indianapolis area teachers to incorporate 3D printers into classroom lessons as a way to promote interest in technology and engineering among students.

3D Parts also intends to make money off the curriculum by offering maintenance services on the printers that go into schools.

Advocates consider 3D printing, also known as “additive manufacturing” or “rapid prototyping,” to be the next major wave of life-changing technology, possibly on par with the personal computer revolution.

The company’s educational project comes as the White House pushes STEM education, including a mentoring program in which Indianapolis will participate.

3D Parts and the teachers it is working with dubbed their program “Masters of the Universe.” The logic behind the name is that engineering can create virtually anything, otherwise giving them “mastery of the universe,” Brand said.

“When I was 8 years old, I wanted to fly. And I think the standard answer was ‘No, you can’t fly,’” he said. “But you know what the answer is today? ‘Yes. That is called aeronautical engineering, and here’s how you get there.’”

3D Parts is giving two printers to each of the eight schools or school districts it is working with: Cardinal Ritter High School, Raymond Park Middle School, Carmel Middle School, H.L. Harshman Middle School, Little Flower Catholic School, the Indiana Math and Science Academy, South Bend Career Academy, and North Daviess Community School Corp. in southern Indiana.

The company handed over the machines and let teachers and students see what they could come up with.

That meant building parts for bottle rockets in Susan Reagin’s class at Raymond Park.

The machines draw students’ attentions because the kids can walk away with something tangible, rather than just lecture notes about computer-aided design software, said Reagin, who teaches computer applications and engineering technology.

“It makes it real-life to them,” she said.

The curriculum project isn’t entirely about altruism for 3D Parts. There is money to be made on the idea.

3D Parts plans to maintain the machines for about $400 per month. Schools currently in the program are receiving grants through TechPoint, an Indiana technology advocacy group, to fund the maintainance.

The curriculum is also part of a new business strategy for eight-employee 3D Parts, which launched in early 2013. The company is giving away printers today, but it will eventually sell them.

Machine sales will likely break even, Brand hopes. But maintaining the printers should generate profit.

The company sets its sights on providing maintenance services as it expects to see 3D printer labs become as common as computer labs today, Brand said.

But in order to get there, schools need to embrace a curriculum with 3D printers.

The “curriculum team” is pooling input from Reagin and the other teachers to figure out what works in classrooms.

3D Parts also tapped insights from technology education consultant David Thornburg, who developed a set of school lessons that use the printers.

Thornburg said he tailored lessons to math and science teachers at a time a lot of states are beginning to mandate that schools teach engineering.

“I realized how panicked some folks can be because of this, simply because ‘Wow, this is going to be mandated?’” he said. "This isn’t as scary as it needs to be. Halfway to engineering is tinkering.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.