IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Home on the range for the holidays

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

 

A&E Mike Runyan added down-home musical charm to this year’s “Yuletide Celebration.” (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

This week, five holiday shows—with and without cynicism.

______

The most heartfelt, inspiring moment in this year’s “Yuletide Celebration”—and perhaps the most beautiful moment I’ve experienced in the eight Indy holiday shows I caught this season—came at an unexpected time … during the encores.

True, there were earlier highlights. The Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra’s zesty “Here We Come a Caroling,” a perky “All I Want for Christmas is You” showcase for the singers and dancers, and a downright hilarious performance by guest magicians Les and Dazzle all helped make the seasonal show bright.

It was during the encore, though, long after the puppet reindeer had made their way down the aisle, the Santas had tapped away, and “O Holy Night” had been belted, that the true magic occurred.

That’s when Mike Runyan, who had earlier added just the right touch of folksiness to his solid musicianship with a sweet rendition of “Home for the Holidays,” paired beautifully with hostess Sandi Patty on “I’ll Be Home for Christmas.” It’s becoming a tradition at such holiday shows to acknowledge the men and women of the armed forces who can’t be with their families over the holiday season, but this ideal combination of performers, instruments and arrangement transcended what I’ve come to expect.

I hope Santa forgives me, but I’m compelled to add that an attempt to celebrate the 25 years of Yuletide with a video presentation felt more like the “In Memoriam” segment on the Oscars than a joyous look back. And while Patty was personable throughout, her delivery and arrangements sometimes crossed the line from spiritual to strident.

The holiday is, of course, a religious one, but a few numbers felt less like heartfelt professions of faith and more like presumptuous religious demands.

A year ago, I lamented that the musical joy of Indianapolis Symphony’s “Yuletide Celebration” was marred by the sideshow acts. This year, the novelties made the show a memorable one. “Yuletide Celebration” runs through Dec. 23.

______

Straight-to-the-heart holiday moments also showed up in Actors Theatre of Indiana’s revival of “A Year with Frog and Toad,” offered at Pike Performing Arts Center Dec. 3-5.

No, this musical isn’t exactly a Yule show, but it does end near the December holidays and includes a touching “Merry Almost Christmas” number that gets to the core of the role people we love play in our search for holiday meaning. Once again, Bradley Reynolds and Don Farrell brought the title duo to life without an ounce of cynicism and with an abundance of humanity.

______

Holiday cynicism is one of the primary selling points of David Sedaris’ “The Santaland Diaries.”

The one-actor play grew out of Sedaris’ essay recounting his stint as a department store elf. For an hour or so, we’re told what it’s like to deal with crying kids, business-minded department store management, quirky Santas and missing-the-point parents by Sedaris/Crumpet the elf.

In a production by Bloomington’s Cardinal Stage that migrated up to the Indy Fringe Building for a run through Dec. 12, Scot Greenwell delivers the laughs and the edge throughout. He’s most winning, though, when delivering a Billie-Holiday inspired “Away in the Manger” and when recounting his encounter with a very special Santa.

Greenwell wisely keeps the revelations on a human scale—there’s not a sense that the experiences forever changed him, just that cracks have formed in his cynical façade. Unlike many one-person shows, “Santaland Diaries” left me wanting to hear more.

______

Cynicism is also the stock in trade of The Leisure Kings, lounge-suited musicians Michael Wiltrout and Sean Baker who, since 2002, have been creating untraditional versions of familiar songs much to the pleasure of open-minded crowds.

This year, the Cabaret at the Columbia Club took the chance of putting such an offbeat act in its first-class venue and the results were a full house and big fun.

Here was probably your only chance to experience an extended version of the schoolyard favorite “Jingle Bells/Batman Smells.” Or to hear “A Christmas Song” fused to the tune of Billy Joel’s “Just the Way You Are.” It’s where a reverent rendition of “Silent Night” is followed by a gargled version of same. And where Queen’s “Bohemian Rhapsody” proved the perfect musical setting for a medley of holiday hits.

On my visit, Wiltrout hadn’t quite adapted completely to the venue, with too much banter about how offended people might or might not be by the material (I didn’t see any walk-outs, even during “The Savior Man,” a joyful twist on “The Candy Man”). And sometimes the Kings took things a step too far, not in outrageousness but just in redundancy (there was nothing gained by the haunted house arrangement of “Silent Night”).

Still, this one-of-a kind-show—featuring a top-notch semi-big-band on stage—looks like an Indy holiday tradition in the making. It offered some of the smartest laughs and entertaining music of the season.

______

There wasn’t a hint of sarcasm in “Silver Bells Silver Screen” (through Dec. 17 at the Athenaeum), the latest production from Bobdirex.

The program notes claim the show was inspired by holiday television specials, but attendees are more likely to think of shows from the former American Cabaret Theatre that used to fill the stage of the Athenaeum with similar musical revues. Here, though, the projected slides are limited mostly to identifying posters from the movies that popularized many of the songs. And the pretension that marred many an ACT show is nowhere to be found.

The vocals are pleasant throughout, with highlights including a nice pairing of “Over the Rainbow” and “Home” (the less-familiar latter coming from the “Oz” redo “The Wiz”). And if the humor is hokey, the energy low-key and the theme fuzzy, that’s part of the charm. Approached with an open heart, “Silver Bells Silver Screen” is like a family gathering where the structure of the evening—and even the talent—is less important than the warmth.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com. Twitter: IBJArts and follow Lou Harry’s A&E blog at www.ibj.com/arts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT