IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Pleasures of 'Godspell' are in the details

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry
"Godspell" actor Brandon Alstott at Actors Theatre of Indiana Actors Theatre of Indiana performs “Godspell” with Brandon Alstott as Jesus. (Photo Courtesy Actors Theatre of Indiana)

It is said (by me, if not by anyone else) that there are two kinds of people in this world of ours: those who prefer “Godspell” and those who prefer “Jesus Christ Superstar.”

The two musicals share source material but differ drastically in their approaches. While the former is more summer camp in its energy and sound, the latter focuses on rock ’n’ roll angst. And while “Superstar” offers a grim Jesus and is concerned with the final days of his life on Earth, “Godspell” features a more benevolent martyr energetically sharing his parables.

While a director’s vision certainly can make one “Superstar” different from another, “Godspell” is by far the more flexible show. Actors Theatre of Indiana’s current production (running through Feb. 26 at the Studio Theatre at the Center for the Performing Arts) is dramatically different from others I’ve seen or read about. And it’s those details—combined with the core pleasures of the material—that make any production of “Godspell” worthwhile.

In an arts world where “appealing to a younger audience” seems to be the mantra, perhaps the gutsiest choice by ATI was to not cast the show entirely with actors around 20. Yes, this does lend a “Cougar Town” quality to the teasing song “Turn Back O Man,” but it also gives this take an added sense of melancholy and universality. This Jesus isn’t just preaching to kids. And his apostles aren’t blank slates to write on but, rather, people who have experienced life already.

"Godspell" at Actors Theatre of Indiana Actors Theatre of Indiana sets its “Godspell” in a bar where Jesus finds his apostles. (Photo Courtesy Actors Theatre of Indiana)

The set, too, is creatively different. I’ve seen “Godspell” set in parks, on fishing wharfs, and in churches, but I haven’t seen one set in a bar. As the show opens, there’s a hint of “The Iceman Cometh” as Jesus enters a world peopled with characters in need of redemption and community. The blowing of the traditional shofar, which usually leads into the opening number, is replaced by the feedback from a microphone deliberately placed too close to a speaker. Nice touch.

The club atmosphere makes the transitions from story to song smooth, and the music is handled smartly throughout by Brent Marty and his band. There are mercifully only a few moments when the show is played awkwardly cute (something I think “Superstar” fans fear of “Godspell”) and the positive vibe of the show is palpable.

For me, the test of any “Godspell” comes in the “On the Willows” sequence where Jesus says goodbye to his disciples. Done well, these goodbyes each highlight a special connection between the savior and each of the saved. Not all of them pop here—blame that in part on a Jesus who lacks gravitas (think early Brendan Frasier). But the confusion captured by Claire (Claire Wilcher), Judy’s (Judy Fitzgerald) palpable sense of loss for the one person who valued her, and Paul’s (Paul D. Nicely) refusal to accept what’s happening all ring particularly powerful and true.


Last year in these pages, I wrote of the pleasures of sitting in on Ball State University theater department classes led by Broadway star Sutton Foster (“Thoroughly Modern Millie,” “Shrek”). With sharp insight, gentle guidance and a best-big-sister-in-the-world approach, she managed to help transform good performances into outstanding ones by bringing the work from within the singing actors, not imposing ideas on them.

This year, with Foster winning a Tony Award for the still-running “Anything Goes” revival on Broadway—and with her TV pilot picked up as a series—I didn’t expect Muncie to be included in her travel plans. Skipping this year would be perfectly understandable.

But there she was, at opening night of Ball State Theatre’s “The Drowsy Chaperone,” humbly being pulled up for a curtain call by the company she co-directed.

"The Drowsy Chaperone" at Ball State University Andy Pickerill and Allison Sill are among those Ball State actors benefitting from working with Broadway star Sutton Foster on “The Drowsy Chaperone.” (Photo Courtesy Ball State University)

She had every right to be proud—as did her directing cohort Bill Jenkins, chairman of the theater department, and the talented company. In a show that celebrates stock characters, you’d think one solid production would be as effective as another. But having raved about the version staged by Booth Tarkington Civic Theatre in the fall, I was happy to see the Ball State crew making new, funny discoveries in the musical comedy.

I may be reading into it, but these grace notes seem to have the Foster imprint—small moments where the performers take the audience from pleasure to bliss with a small gesture or pause. I was particularly enamored with the work of Alison Sill as the knowing chaperone, Katie Mazzini as a wonderfully absent-minded Mrs. Tottendale, and—in the role Foster played on Broadway—Betsy Farrar as the bride, Janet. There’s a distinct pleasure you get when a comedic actor isn’t just working the punch lines, but creating joy just by being onstage. Despite some audio mixing problems (the talented orchestra too often drowned out the accomplished actors), this was a “Chaperone” well worth the drive. It provided even more evidence that Ball State should be on the radar of any central Indiana theater lover—or any theatrical casting director looking for young talent.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No Men?
    Nice summary of the Ball State production of "The Drowsy Chaperone", but from reading your piece, it appears that Ms. Foster's touch only made contact with some of the key women characters in the show. None of the men merited mention, not even the ubiquitous Man in Chair?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT