MARCUS: Elves to vote on unionization at the North Pole

Morton Marcus
December 11, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

Normally, I do not report my conversations with Elvin Elfenhousen until we are closer to X-eve, as they call it at the North Pole. But this year is different. This year, Santa is having problems and the frustrated elves are prepared to vote on recognition of the Union of Wish Fulfillment Workers.

One might think from the movies that Santa is immune from labor problems and not subject to the discipline of the Great Recession. That is not true.

Recessions bring stress. Households afflicted with stress are not as generous with good deeds and kind words. It is the collection of these deeds and words that occupies Santa’s elves during much of the year. Then, as the eve approaches, the elves trade the good deeds and kind words for the things they require to create Santa’s famous array of gifts.

Hard times make for hard work. The elves feel that Santa has not given them sufficient credit for the work they have done these past few years, when goodness and kindness were hard to find. Santa, they charge, does not appreciate how hard it is to negotiate with feigned goodness and insincere kindness for lumber and electronics.

For his part, Santa denies these claims. The elves, he says, “became accustomed to easy times and forgot that there is hard work to be done meeting the wishes of millions. They’ve gotten soft in good times and lost the edge necessary to work hard. The union will only engender and endorse an atmosphere of sloth. The camaraderie of the workshop will be replaced with unjustifiable tension.”

The UWFW wants to bargain for more rest periods for elves. The union seeks better training for elves so the demands of the job do not cause such high levels of stress. Therapeutic benefits are also sought, including Caribbean cruises for those suffering from PXS (Post X-eve Syndrome).

Not all the elves seek union representation. Although they may share elements of dissatisfaction with the pro-union group, these dissenters have hesitations about joining a union so forcefully opposed by Santa.

Thus, at the North Pole, questions about right-to-work rules have arisen. Must a dissenting elf, who chooses not to join the UWFW, pay union dues and be subject to the union contract? Will Santa’s Workshop be open to all or closed to those who reject union membership?

“What do you think?” Elvin asked me.

“I don’t know enough about it to have a valid opinion,” I said.

“But you have an opinion on everything,” Elvin objected.

“But not a valid one,” I responded.

“You mean you fake it,” he said. “You don’t want to appear either uninformed or just plain stupid.”

“That’s how it is,” I said in my best Walter Cronkite voice. “Honesty most often involves ambiguity, complexity and uncertainty. People don’t want to hear what needs to be said. They want the short ‘elevator speech,’ a snappy summation measured in seconds for a topic that requires weeks to understand.”

“And about the UWFW?” he asked again.

“Go for it,” I advised, “but don’t let the union get entrenched the way management gets entrenched. Make sure that, every few years, there is a recertification election in which the union has to win approval from the elves and does not continue in perpetuity. I’d like to see term limits or open, fair elections for union and corporate leadership so that ‘experience’ does not become a synonym for ‘complacency.’”

“You mean … ?” he said.

“Yes,” I said, “Santa needs to stand for re-election just like anyone else who claims to be acting in the public interest.”•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1