Marian has waiting list for very first medical class

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Marian University in Indianapolis has announced it has reached its self-imposed limit of 162 students for the incoming class of its new college of osteopathic medicine.

School officials said they have received tuition deposits from 162 applicants. They say those students can still pursue their education elsewhere, but the school has a waiting list. They said they are confident they can fill any vacancies that arise.

The school said it will be the first medical school to open in Indiana in more than 100 years.

Dean Paul Evans said the college will help at a time when there is a growing shortage of doctors because of an aging population and doctors retiring.

Osteopathic doctors have similar training to traditional physicians, but also are trained in diagnosing and treating musculoskeletal problems.


  • What?
    GoJeepDog, did you even read the headline. It says they have a waiting list already for spots. They have reached their limit of 162 applicants and if any of those should decide not to enroll they have others waiting to take their spot.
  • very interesting
    I find it very interesting that a brand, spanking new medical school is just barely filling its first class. I can guarantee you that if this was a traditional allopathic (meaning a school from MDs graduate)school, it would have way more applicants than accepted students. I too agree that many DOs are well qualified to practice medicine but I do find the fact that they're arguably struggling to fill the class as interesting....
  • Just to clarify
    "Osteopathic doctors have similar training to traditional physicians, but also are trained in diagnosing and treating musculoskeletal problems." This is somewhat misleading. The only thing "extra" that osteopathic students get is training in osteopathic manipulation, which is poorly validated and not even most osteopaths practice or believe in. The reason it's not in the curriculum of traditional medical schools is there isn't scientific support for it. The primary difference between osteopathic and traditional medical schools is that osteopathic schools are easier to get in to. MCAT scores and GPAs (despite a more forgiving calculation by D.O. schools) are universally lower for D.O. schools than traditional medical schools. The main reason one attends a D.O. school is inability to get in to medical school. Does that mean that D.O.s are inferior physicians than M.D.s? Absolutely not. I'd take a motivated, caring D.O. over many M.D.s. Many D.O.s take the same residency training programs as M.D.s and are well qualified in their field. It is tough for a D.O. student, however, to get a spot in more competitive specialty residencies, however. That's not all bad, as they are far more likely to go into primary care, where there's the greater need. Perhaps in the future we'll see D.O.s fulfilling much of the primary care role, and M.D.s filling many of the specialty and research positions. Regardless, Marian seems to be doing everything possible to get their osteopathic school off to a good start.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).