IBJNews

State unlikely to act on push for lower booze level for driving

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Federal officials are recommending that states reduce the amount of alcohol people can drink and still get behind the wheel. But a key state lawmaker says that’s not likely to happen in Indiana.

The National Traffic Safety Board voted Tuesday for a series of recommendations, including that states lower the legal blood-alcohol limit for driving to 0.05 percent. Currently, the legal blood-alcohol level for driving is 0.08 percent in Indiana and most states.

The board’s vote came on the 25th anniversary of the nation’s deadliest drunk-driving incident, a bus crash in Carrollton, Ky., where 3 adults and 24 children died.

Sen. Tom Wyss, R-Fort Wayne, fought for 11 years in the Indiana General Assembly to bring the blood-alcohol level down from 0.10 percent to 0.08 percent before lawmakers approved the change in 2001. Wyss said at the time that the law passed in part because the federal government was threatening to withhold significant amounts of transportation money from Indiana if it didn’t make the change.

On Tuesday, Wyss said he’s doubtful the General Assembly would consider reducing the level again – and it would be “nearly impossible” to bring the level to 0.05 percent.

“It’s an effort I would not undertake again,” Wyss said.

Sen. Phil Boots, R-Crawfordsville, said he probably would not support the move. He said he would need to see more evidence that moving the level would actually be beneficial.

Indiana law does allow a person to be arrested if caught driving with a 0.05 percent blood-alcohol level – but only if the officer can prove impairment.

“I think we are just getting over the top and harassing people,” Boots said.

However, Wyss said that with a blood-alcohol level of 0.05 percent, a person shows signs of impairment and shouldn’t be driving. He said he showed his colleagues data more than a decade ago that proves about 98 percent of people are impaired at 0.05.

But he said many people feel it is their right to drive drunk or impaired – and it’s not.

At least 100 other countries have a blood-alcohol limit of 0.05 percent, including Europe.

“Other countries are much further ahead of the U.S. and their understandings of drunk driving,” Wyss said.

Kara Brooks, press secretary for Gov. Mike Pence, said the office is aware of the federal agency’s recommendation but has not had official communication about it.

“When we do, we will give the review consideration,” Brooks said.

The NTSB also recommended that states increase the use of visible law enforcement on the roads, require ignition interlocks for all drunk driving offenders and create and use more courts specializing in cases of driving while under the influence.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Lock'Em up
    I say we up the penalty on turn signal offenses. Forget to turn your turn signal on, minimum two years. Really, we elect politicians thinking they are supposed to work for citizens and they waste time on stupid stuff like this. How many tax dollars and hours are being wasted trying to go from .08 to .05. Are there not better things to focus time and energy. Wonder how many accidents are caused by drivers at the .06 level, or is this just another reach for more taxes through fines.
  • Another Stupid Idea From Washington
    What other countries do is a distinction in search of a difference. First Wyss cites Europe. Europe has is a much smaller, more densely populated continent with highly developed mass transit systems. It is also filled with small local pubs in about every block, so people do not tend to venture far from home. Wyss claims they are "way ahead" of us. Does the fact that many countries have no minimum drinking age make them "way ahead", Senator? This is clearly another way the goveernment can extract money from responsible, law abiding citizens. The only people this affects are those who are conscientious enough to "say when" between .05 and .08. So now, for three one hundredths of one percent less BAC, you go to jail, lose your license and thousands of $$? Serious offenders won't be deterred.
  • Boozin'
    Who is telling us that we cannot drink, text, talk and drive? What an intrusion on our rights. David Bissard agrees...
  • Enough Fed Nanny
    I think most of us are getting sick and tired of the Feds becoming our Nanny, and almighty protector from ourselves. Do they not have enough work to do? Sounds like we should be downsizing the multiple Fed agencies so they can do the work they were legislated to do in the first place. Obsession of catching people in the act of something wrong has gone way to far in this country.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT