IBJOpinion

SURF THIS: Web Research 101 ... going beyond Wikipedia

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Jim Cota

I’m not generally one to spend a lot of time looking back and thinking I’d like to relive any part of my childhood, but I can’t help but wonder what things would have been like growing up with the Internet.

At the risk of sounding like one of those old guys who had to walk to school four miles through the snow—uphill both ways—kids today have it easy. When I was in school, reports were based on dry text found in dusty encyclopedias that were probably out of date before they arrived in your local library. (That reminds me: We had to go to the library to do research!)

Now, with the Internet, kids have access to a wealth of accurate, timely information on nearly any topic you can think of. Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.com) still remains the de facto standard for research, having an archive containing more than 15 million articles (3.3 million of which are in English), making it the largest and most popular general reference work available.

Even with that wealth of information, or perhaps because of it, Wikipedia is certainly not without its detractors. Critics point out that the departure from contents provided by experts detracts from its authenticity. Crowd-sourcing invites errors, they say.

Research suggests otherwise. An investigation in Nature found that the crowd-sourced material came close to the level of accuracy found in Encyclopedia Britannica and had a similar rate of “serious errors.” When you factor in the speed of updates and the breadth of current information, Wikipedia is tough to beat.

If you need to go beyond the basic facts, there are a variety of places to turn. To really get a handle on how stuff works, the best resource available is, well, How Stuff Works (www.howstuffworks.com). Founded by North Carolina State University professor Marshall Brain (yes, his name is really Brain) in 1998, the site is now owned by Discovery Communications, which has greatly expanded its content. How Stuff Works aims to “demystify the world and do it in a simple, clear-cut way that anyone can understand.” To accomplish this, the site provides comprehensive articles with graphics and videos to walk you through nearly any topic clearly, simply and objectively.

If you’re looking for do-it-yourself information, eHow (www.ehow.com) can probably help. The eHow online community is dedicated to giving you the ability to research, share and discuss solutions and tips for completing day-to-day tasks and projects. With more than 20 categories and more than 150,000 videos, chances are pretty good that you can find what you need here, especially if it’s a task-oriented issue.

An interesting side note: Unlike Wikipedia, which is updated by volunteers around the world, the articles on eHow are sourced by people who are then paid by how many times their articles are viewed. So if you have a particular skill and an ability to write, you might find you could make a little residual income by penning articles for eHow.

What if you’re just looking for data, and maybe a way to better understand it? One of the more recent entries in this area is This We Know: www.thisweknow.org.

This We Know doesn’t generate its own data. Instead, it accesses several databases collected by and made available by the government. The site’s mission is to present the information in an easy-to-understand and consistent manner, empowering citizens to act on what’s known. Which begs the question, “What is known?” Things like rates of pollution, employment, population and health trends.

Right now, the site is focusing on presenting data from approximately six different data sets. Long term, the goal is to “model the entire data.gov catalog” and make it available for viewing on the web. Ultimately, the hope is to “provide citizens with a single destination where they can search and browse all the information the government collects.” Yes, that says ALL the information the federal government collects, which you can probably imagine, is quite a lot. But we paid for it, so shouldn’t it be available? And wouldn’t it be great if it were easy to understand, as well? That’s where This We Know is heading and, if it succeeds, school reports will be better—and the students who write them will be smarter than ever.•

__________

Cota is creative director of Rare Bird Inc., a full-service advertising agency specializing in the use of new technologies. His column appears monthly. He can be reached at jim@rarebirdinc.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT