IBJOpinion

SURF THIS: Web Research 101 ... going beyond Wikipedia

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Jim Cota

I’m not generally one to spend a lot of time looking back and thinking I’d like to relive any part of my childhood, but I can’t help but wonder what things would have been like growing up with the Internet.

At the risk of sounding like one of those old guys who had to walk to school four miles through the snow—uphill both ways—kids today have it easy. When I was in school, reports were based on dry text found in dusty encyclopedias that were probably out of date before they arrived in your local library. (That reminds me: We had to go to the library to do research!)

Now, with the Internet, kids have access to a wealth of accurate, timely information on nearly any topic you can think of. Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.com) still remains the de facto standard for research, having an archive containing more than 15 million articles (3.3 million of which are in English), making it the largest and most popular general reference work available.

Even with that wealth of information, or perhaps because of it, Wikipedia is certainly not without its detractors. Critics point out that the departure from contents provided by experts detracts from its authenticity. Crowd-sourcing invites errors, they say.

Research suggests otherwise. An investigation in Nature found that the crowd-sourced material came close to the level of accuracy found in Encyclopedia Britannica and had a similar rate of “serious errors.” When you factor in the speed of updates and the breadth of current information, Wikipedia is tough to beat.

If you need to go beyond the basic facts, there are a variety of places to turn. To really get a handle on how stuff works, the best resource available is, well, How Stuff Works (www.howstuffworks.com). Founded by North Carolina State University professor Marshall Brain (yes, his name is really Brain) in 1998, the site is now owned by Discovery Communications, which has greatly expanded its content. How Stuff Works aims to “demystify the world and do it in a simple, clear-cut way that anyone can understand.” To accomplish this, the site provides comprehensive articles with graphics and videos to walk you through nearly any topic clearly, simply and objectively.

If you’re looking for do-it-yourself information, eHow (www.ehow.com) can probably help. The eHow online community is dedicated to giving you the ability to research, share and discuss solutions and tips for completing day-to-day tasks and projects. With more than 20 categories and more than 150,000 videos, chances are pretty good that you can find what you need here, especially if it’s a task-oriented issue.

An interesting side note: Unlike Wikipedia, which is updated by volunteers around the world, the articles on eHow are sourced by people who are then paid by how many times their articles are viewed. So if you have a particular skill and an ability to write, you might find you could make a little residual income by penning articles for eHow.

What if you’re just looking for data, and maybe a way to better understand it? One of the more recent entries in this area is This We Know: www.thisweknow.org.

This We Know doesn’t generate its own data. Instead, it accesses several databases collected by and made available by the government. The site’s mission is to present the information in an easy-to-understand and consistent manner, empowering citizens to act on what’s known. Which begs the question, “What is known?” Things like rates of pollution, employment, population and health trends.

Right now, the site is focusing on presenting data from approximately six different data sets. Long term, the goal is to “model the entire data.gov catalog” and make it available for viewing on the web. Ultimately, the hope is to “provide citizens with a single destination where they can search and browse all the information the government collects.” Yes, that says ALL the information the federal government collects, which you can probably imagine, is quite a lot. But we paid for it, so shouldn’t it be available? And wouldn’t it be great if it were easy to understand, as well? That’s where This We Know is heading and, if it succeeds, school reports will be better—and the students who write them will be smarter than ever.•

__________

Cota is creative director of Rare Bird Inc., a full-service advertising agency specializing in the use of new technologies. His column appears monthly. He can be reached at jim@rarebirdinc.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT