MARCUS: Today's data tell yesterday's story

Morton Marcus
October 24, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

Most economists are of the opinion that we have seen the bottom of the recession and are in recovery mode. However, the evidence is scarce to support that position. There are signs here and there, fragments of data, and stories galore. But solid evidence has yet to arrive.

We are finding out what the bottom looked like, assuming the second quarter of this year was the bottom. This is like getting the pictures of your vacation a few months after you enjoyed the experience. So let’s take a walk down memory lane.

The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis just released the latest personal income estimates for the nation as a whole and each of the 50 states. The second quarter of 2009 showed an increase of 0.2 percent for the country. This infinitesimal increase was far better than the 2.3-percent drop in the first quarter and was most welcome after three consecutive quarters of decline.

Indiana fared well in these data. At 0.5 percent, we ranked 16th in the nation and were among the 37 states that saw personal income rise in the second quarter. But don’t break out the champagne yet. For both the nation and Indiana, these data are correct, but illusory.

Personal income includes unemployment compensation. This is a good idea if you want to measure consumers’ buying power. In the second quarter, unemployment-insurance payments in Indiana and the country overall rose 45 percent as more people lost jobs. This made unemployment insurance in Indiana ($3.6 billion at an annual rate), greater than the contributions to personal income from farming and mining combined.

It was that 45-percent growth in unemployment compensation that accounted for the advance in the nation’s personal income. If our interest is economic activity, then earnings (what people are paid working for themselves or for someone else) is probably the best measure we can get at the state and local level.

Since 1997, earnings in Indiana and the nation as a whole averaged 76 percent of personal income. While personal income rose slightly in the second quarter of this year at the national level, earnings fell 1 percent; Indiana saw a decline of 1.2 percent. Over the past year, earnings in the nation fell 4.2 percent, and 5.7 percent in Indiana. That decline left the Hoosier state fifth from the bottom among the states, just ahead of Connecticut.

Earnings peaked in Indiana during the first quarter of 2008, whereas the national peak was two quarters later. We entered this recession half a year before the nation did. Nine other states peaked when we did, but none of them were neighboring states. Florida, Idaho and Nevada, where housing speculation was rampant, peaked one quarter before Indiana. Michigan peaked before all other states—in the third quarter of 2007, a year before the nation. Twenty-four states combined to give the nation its peak in earnings during the third quarter of 2008, and nine peaked a quarter later.

This pattern of scattered peaks is important, because it shows how dissimilar the states are. We may expect to find scattered starts to the recovery. Not that Michigan and Indiana will recover before the nation, but that many states will rise before the mass of states and a few will trail.

That same disparity will exist among sectors of the economy. Some will lead and others will follow. The result is that many people will not see the recovery in its earliest stages and will deny its existence. Those who witness a change in the economy before others are the true believers. The rest remain agnostic for a few quarters longer.•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1