What happened to Di Rimini architect?

November 13, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

“The city needs to beef up its oversight of construction projects,” says the Nov. 8 editorial concerning the Di Rimini apartment project problems. But the city has only a small role in such oversight.

All commercial construction projects, such as the Di Rimini project, have many tiers of supervision, inspection, communication and oversight between the participants in such projects. One of these participants, not mentioned in the editorial, nor in earlier articles in IBJ describing the many code and safety violations, is the architect.

Where was the architect when the developer made those 35 departures from the approved plans? Where was the architect when the city cited the developer for multiple code violations? Where was the architect during construction that he or she did not observe these violations as they were being made? My guess is that the architect abdicated his or her role as observer and reporter of such violations, a duty under Indiana statute.

There is a reason why the state requires all architects to have a vast educational background in the art, science and technology of building design and construction, supplemented by years of supervised internship under the guidance of a qualified senior architect, and [to] pass rigorous multiple professional examinations before one can legally call themselves an architect.

The state recognizes and relies on the architect’s comprehensive role in all commercial construction by making the architect solely responsible for assuring that all building codes are followed, and that the building depicted on paper is the same building actually built. No other party to a construction project is charged with such responsibility, or has such an ominous duty to the people of Indiana. That duty is to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public concerning all commercial buildings. Both the state and the city should be able to rely on the architect’s vigilance and professional objectivity to supplement their role, which is predominantly enforcement.

No builder or developer may build a commercial project in Indiana without first obtaining the services of a licensed architect or professional engineer. Nor can they make any changes to an architect’s design without first obtaining approval from that architect. Clearly there is a missing element in the Di Rimini apartments story, and one that does not imply that the city was deficient in any way in their role as code enforcer or construction overseer. A stop-work order by the city is a draconian measure, and seldom used.

Where was the architect and how does he think he is protecting the health, safety and welfare of the public?


James Robert Stutzman


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...