IBJNews

2012 Forty Under 40: Darcey M. Palmer-Shultz

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Darcey M. Palmer-Shultz
Where were you, and what were you doing in 1991?
At St. Joseph Elementary School in Fort Wayne.

When you graduated from high school, what did you think you wanted to be as an adult?
I was very interested in journalism.

Was there an event in the last 20 years that had a great impact on your aspirations and/or career path?
Every interaction I’ve had with a child or family served by Big Brothers Big Sisters has reinforced my passion to work for this organization on behalf of kids.

Have you been mentored by (or had any significant interactions with) previous Forty Under 40 honorees? What did you learn from that person? What do you admire about that person?
Susan Brock Williams was my first Indianapolis mentor. Marty Posch helps me remember every single day that important, hard work can be, and should be, fun.

Where/what do you want to be 20 years from now?
I hope things look a lot like they do now.


 
 

CEO, Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Indiana
Age: 30

Darcey Palmer-Shultz has at least 60 first cousins. She still likes to spend time with her large extended family, but she also knows that not every child has such positive experiences.

As CEO of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Indiana, Palmer-Shultz helps develop mentors so hundreds of local children who don’t have family members to turn to can have positive adults in their lives. Last year, the organization served 1,175 kids and supported mentoring relationships, largely due to “an amazing staff,” she said.

Palmer-Shultz has worked for Big Brothers Big Sisters eight years—two in her hometown of Fort Wayne and six in Indianapolis—first in event planning, recruitment and marketing, and then gradually assuming more responsibility in fundraising, strategic planning and managing relationships with significant partners. She has been CEO since October, after having served as interim leader.

When she graduated with a political science degree from St. Mary’s College in South Bend, she says, “I was interested in doing something that helps kids.” She started with Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northeast Indiana and soon grew passionate about its work.

“It became a very natural and good fit,” she said.

In Indianapolis, she launched the first Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Indiana Alumni Association, which is designed to engage kids and adults in reunion activities and opportunities to reconnect with the organization.

“We wanted to hear the stories from both the kids and the adults,” she said.

She also cultivated a statewide alliance of 21 Big Brother Big Sister agencies for lobbying efforts.

Outside of work, she and her husband, Michael Shultz, are active in Giving Sum, a philanthropic group that awards a $50,000 grant to one local organization—this year it’s Indy Reads—then commits volunteer hours with the recipient organization.

“It started in a friends-asking-friends kind of way,” said Palmer-Shultz, whose is finishing a term on the board. She values the experience for developing leadership skills and as a way to learn about local organizations.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT