2012 Forty Under 40: Frank P. Vogel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Frank P. Vogel
Where were you, and what were you doing in 1991?
Graduating high school in Wildwood, N.J.

When you graduated from high school, what did you think you wanted to be as an adult?
An orthopedic surgeon making time to help coach my kids’ basketball teams.

Was there an event in the last 20 years that had a great impact on your aspirations and/or career path?
I was inspired by the story of Kentucky’s turnaround and recovery from harsh NCAA sanctions under Rick Pitino. Specifically, the 1992 Duke-Kentucky NCAA tournament game (the greatest college basketball game ever played) and UK’S dominant run to the 1993 Final Four. The way Pitino used positive energy and a relentless work ethic while making the game fun inspired me to pursue coaching as a full-time profession.

Where/what do you want to be 20 years from now?
Head coach of the Indiana Pacers competing for yet another NBA Championship and earning longevity comparisons to Jerry Sloan.

Coach, Indiana Pacers
Age: 38

Frank Vogel specializes in making the difficult seem routine.

As a 13-year-old, he appeared on “Late Night with David Letterman,” spinning a basketball on the end of a toothbrush as he brushed his teeth.

After three years as a Division III college basketball player and pre-med student at Juniata College in Pennsylvania—and with no connections to help him—he transferred to the University of Kentucky and convinced coaches Rick Pitino and Jim O’Brien to hire him as a student manager so he could learn coaching.

And last year, as interim coach of the Indiana Pacers, he guided the team to a 20-18 record and its first playoff appearance in five years after taking over for O’Brien, his longtime mentor.

Being asked to replace O’Brien was “the hardest thing I ever had to do in my life,” Vogel said. But O’Brien made the transition relatively painless. When Pacers General Manager Larry Bird called to say that O’Brien was being fired, “I was speechless,” Vogel said. “Silent. Before I could say a word, Jim O’Brien interjects. ‘Frank, it’s OB here. I’m on this call, too. I want to let you know this is the right thing for the Pacers and I’m 100 percent in support of this move.’ At that point, it became a lot easier.”

Vogel sees himself in a great position now. He loves Indianapolis—“There’s no better place in the country to raise a family”—and hopes he and his wife, Jen, and their daughters, ages 7 and 5, will be here for a long time. He’s also young enough to relate to his players in a way that older coaches perhaps can’t.

Vogel calls his experience “one of those perseverance stories.” Since teams tend to take on the personality of their coaches, he hopes his approach rubs off on the Pacers.

“What I am encouraging my team to do is to dream big and work your ass off to get there,” he said. “I’m not afraid of raising expectations and raising hopes and have our guys chase after it.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.