IBJNews

Arcadia in danger of stock exchange delisting

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Arcadia Resources Inc. has been notified by NYSE Amex Equities Exchange that its stock price is too low to be trading on the exchange.

The Indianapolis-based health care company said on Friday that the exchange advised it to undertake a reverse stock split to avoid delisting and gave the company until Oct. 4 to complete the split.

“The company continues to monitor the trading price of its common stock and is considering its options to comply with [the standards],” Arcadia said in a press release.

Shares of Arcadia opened Monday morning priced at 15 cents each. The stock has closed at an average price of less than 20 cents over a consecutive 30-day trading period, which triggered the warning.

The stock hasn’t traded at 20 cents or above since Feb. 9. The stock reached a 52-week high of 83 cents per share last April 21.

A delsiting would relegate Arcadia shares to penny-stock status on the over-the-counter bulletin board or the pink sheets. Once that happens, shares are harder to buy and sell.

Arcadia offers pharmacy services, in addition to providing home health care staffing and selling medical equipment by catalog. Its flagship pharmacy product is DailyMed, which packages dosages of prescription medicines into individual packets labeled with the time of day they are to be taken.

For its most recent fiscal quarter, which ended Dec. 31, Arcadia lost $2.3 million, or 1 cent per share, on revenue of $26.2 million. That compares to a loss of $3.2 million, or 2 cents per share, on revenue of $25.7 million for the same quarter in 2009.

In May 2010, the company announced that it planned to add 930 jobs at its northeast-side headquarters by 2013.

Arcadia agreed in 2007 to move from Southfield, Mich., to Indianapolis and create 400 jobs over two years in exchange for about $6 million in economic development incentives.

Arcadia is the second Indianapolis-based company within the past six months to be threatened with delisting.

On Nov. 1, NASDAQ notified Emmis Communications Corp. that it no longer was in compliance with an exchange rule that requires members to carry a minimum stock price of $1. Company shares had closed below $1 per share for 30 consecutive business days, triggering the notice.

But in February, shares closed above the necessary threshold of $1 each for 10 consecutive business days, likely enabling Emmis to avoid delisting.

Its shares are currently trading at $1.04 each.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT