IBJNews

Arcadia Resources to delist stock amid cash crunch

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Arcadia Resources Inc. plans to let its stock be delisted from the NYSE Amex Equities Exchange as the company focuses instead on selling one of its business units to raise cash.

The struggling Indianapolis-based company’s stock price had dwindled to just 5 cents a share as of late Tuesday morning. After the markets closed Monday, Arcadia announced its first-quarter earnings and its decision to delist its stock. Arcadia’s shares will now trade over the counter, which makes them harder to buy and sell.

Arcadia, which had been planning a huge expansion in Indianapolis, is running low on cash, in part because the ramp-up of its DailyMed pharmacy service has been slower than expected. DailyMed is a service that packages patients’ medications into packets marked by the time of day or the meal at which they are to be taken. The service has major contracts with Indiana Medicaid and Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc.

In May 2010, Arcadia announced that it expected to add 930 jobs in Indiana by 2013. But, according to the company’s annual report released in June, its administrative staff has actually fallen slightly in the last year, to 229. Its field staff, most of whom are not in Indiana, has remained steady from a year ago.

DailyMed sales drove up Arcadia’s pharmacy division revenue by 7 percent, to $4.3 million, in the three months ended June 30. Arcadia’s home health care services unit posted $20.4 million in revenue, flat from the same quarter a year ago.

Overall, Arcadia lost $3 million in the quarter, or 2 cents per share, compared with a loss of $4.7 million, or 3 cents per share, a year ago.

Revenue rose 1.6 percent, to $24.8 million.

Arcadia had negative cash flow in the quarter of $1.6 million, but the company said it still has $2.2 million in cash and a line of credit to work with.

“The company’s focus during the quarter has been on implementing our previously announced restructuring actions. We continue to be in discussions to sell the Services segment, but we do not yet have a definitive agreement to sell that business,” said Marvin Richardson, CEO of Arcadia, in a prepared statement.

“Our immediate focus is on managing the near-term liquidity needs of the company. Management is aggressively managing our cash availability while the company considers broader strategic alternatives to address our near-term and longer-term liquidity needs.”

Arcadia has intended to shift its focus exclusively to DailyMed since it launched the service in January 2008. It sold its home health equipment and industrial staffing businesses in 2009 to help fund DailyMed’s expansion. Now it is trying to do the same with its services segment, but has yet to complete a sale.

In the meantime, Arcadia is trying to conserve cash and boost profit margins in the DailyMed business.

“While we have seen improvements in our operating results, the rate of our progress is slower than we planned,” Richardson said. “In our Pharmacy segment, we continue to work with potential new payors. We have made improvements in our Pharmacy operating results without significant increases in volume as we gradually improve gross margins and carefully manage our expenses.”

In June, Arcadia announced that its auditor issued a going-concern warning about the company, because it faces a pile of debt that comes due in April 2012. Arcadia needs to sell its services business to help pay off those debts, but will also likely need to raise additional financing to completely wriggle out of its financial pinch.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT