Bank seeks to foreclose on architectural firm’s HQ

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

KeyBank is attempting to foreclose on the new headquarters location that A2SO4 Architecture LLC has occupied only a few months, claiming the firm owes it nearly $1 million.

The Cleveland-based bank filed a lawsuit against A2SO4 on May 28 and is asking a Marion Superior Court judge to appoint a receiver to manage the property at 540 N. College Ave. during court proceedings.

A2SO4, one of the largest architectural firms in Indianapolis, in early April moved from Union Station to a former Catholic Church at the southwest corner of College Avenue and North Street, near the Lockerbie neighborhood.

The firm spent $1 million rehabbing the 11,000-square-foot building, which is larger than the 9,000 square feet the firm formerly occupied.

KeyBank loaned A2SO4 $1.1 million in February 2012, according to the bank’s suit, which says the firm and a related defendant have since defaulted on payments under the terms of the loan. The principal balance on the loan was $907,651 as of May 14. Including interest and attorney's fees, KeyBank is seeking a total of $925,301.

Reached by phone, Sanford Garner, A2SO4’s managing partner, said he is working with the bank to restructure the loan. A lawyer representing the bank did not return a phone call seeking comment.

This is not the first time in recent months A2SO4 has been accused of falling behind in payments.

In February, the state temporarily shut the firm down because it owed more than $43,300 in delinquent taxes. The Indiana Department of Revenue revoked the firm’s retail merchant certificate, which authorizes companies to withhold sales taxes and employee payroll taxes.

Garner said at the time that the state never should have closed his business because it’s not a retail establishment and doesn’t collect sales taxes. A February letter from the state to Garner’s attorney supported that contention.

The letter further said the department was satisfied with the firm’s commitment to address unpaid employee withholding taxes and would take no further action.

A2SO4 was founded in 2001 by architects Sanford Garner and Vop Osili, who are among relatively few black architects in Indiana. Osili left A2SO4 in 2010 to run for secretary of state and then sold his interest in 2011. He currently is an Indianapolis city-county councilor.

With 2011 billings of $3.4 million, A2SO4 ranked as the city’s 11th-largest architectural firm in IBJ’s "Book of Lists."

Garner has said 2012 was the firm’s worst year. He attributed the slump to a prolonged slowdown in the economy, coupled with an increase in outstanding client bills.

One client stiffed the firm on a $189,000 bill for a mixed-usedproject that ultimately “fell apart,” while several others each owed A2SO2 $60,000 to $80,000, Garner said.

That left A2SO4 unable to pay some of its project partners, including Indianapolis-based Heapy Engineering Indiana LLC.

Heapy filed suit in December against A2SO4 in Marion Superior Court, claiming the firm owed it $89,796 in unpaid invoices, in addition to $20,233 in interest and attorney's fees. That suit is pending.

A2SO4's design projects have included a parking garage for Eskenazi Health, the interior design for a series of five-story buildings to surround downtown's Barton Tower, and several projects at Indianapolis International Airport.


  • Left holding a bag
    File me as another design firm that was left holding the bag with unpaid fees for our services to their firm. Cant even get a single return call on a bill that is 16 months past due.
  • CFO(Corrupt Finanacial Officer)
    To my umderstanding this individual was never available to clients or employees by keeping banker hours which hindered her from responding to important finanacal issues unless it impacted her personally.
  • What a joke!
    Sanford contends that one client did not pay $189,000 and others did not pay $60,000 to $80,000. Is this the reason he gives for not paying his consultants' bills on projects where HIS CLIENT DID PAY ALL BILLS IN FULL? Heapy claims nearly $90,000 in unpaid bills while other consultants haved unpaid bills totaling several times that amount. "Deadbeat" is absolutely correct, "not paying your bills is no different than stealing", and that is exactly what Sanford has done, stolen from those who trusted him! Beware!
  • What goes around, comes around
    This company was doomed after Vop left. Fortunately most of the employees jumped off the sinking ship...missing payroll several times and not contributing to their 401ks will do that. Plus have the CFO of the company buy a BMW and the next week lay off several employees. Keep it classy Sanford.
    • Pay up, Losers
      It's always nice to know who in the community doesn't pay their bills. The way I see it, not paying your bills is no different than stealing. You made a promise to pay. You lied and somebody else is hurt as a result. I wonder how many BMWs are in the parking lot. Never understood why cockroaches feel so at home behind the wheel of a Beemer.
    • Should have used First Merchant's
      That bank allowed the statute of limitation on foreclosure to expire on a 2nd mortgage of $879,500 in 2010. That was worth over $20M with accrued interest over 30 years. Not one penny in payments and no action to foreclose. This architectural firm just took out a mortgage from the wrong company.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

      2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

      3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

      4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

      5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.