Not-for-profit launches search after CEO suddenly quits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tonja Eagan's sudden resignation as CEO of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Indiana was not precipitated by an internal conflict, a spokeswoman said on Wednesday.

Big Brothers Big Sisters announced Eagan's resignation Monday. Spokeswoman Kelly Young said Eagan notified the not-for-profit's board of directors and staff members about her decision through an e-mail sent over the weekend. The resignation was effective immediately.

Young acknowledged the board was taken by surprise at the departure. Eagan had been CEO for five years.

"It was a just a personal decision she made. The board supports it," Young said. 

Darcey Palmer-Shultz, who had been overseeing strategic planning, will oversee day-to-day operations of the not-for-profit as interim chief operating officer while the board conducts a national search for Eagan's replacement.

Eagan, whose annual salary was $121,355, was previously CEO of Girls Inc. She has worked in the not-for-profit sector for 25 years.

In an e-mail to staff members, Eagan explained that she was taking a "much-needed" break, Young said. In a later Facebook post, she said she planned to spend the next six months reading, teaching, volunteering and relaxing, and that she would "regroup and experience as much laughter as possible."

Eagan did not return a call from IBJ.

Eagan oversaw a $2.4 million budget and 30 staff members. Big Brothers Big Sisters arranges one-on-one mentoring for youth, and the local organization supports 1,225 mentor relationships in Marion, Hamilton and Johnson counties.

Bryan Orander, principal of Charitable Advisors, a consulting firm that helps hire CEOs, said it's unusual for not-for-profit CEOs to quit on such short notice without having another job lined up.

“It doesn’t happen very often,” he said. "In this economy, when people feel good just to have jobs, you don't see people just stepping out."

Not-for-profit executives do burn out from time to time, Orander said. Research in the sector has found that pressure to raise money and maintaining relationships with the board of directors are frequent complaints, Orander said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  2. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  3. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  4. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

  5. No one is complaining about these jobs coming to Indianapolis. We are complaining about the need to subsidize these low wage jobs. Why do you never hear a peep from republicans and tea partiers about this type of welfare? We should only be subsidizing high wage, high skilled jobs.