IBJNews

Not-for-profit launches search after CEO suddenly quits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tonja Eagan's sudden resignation as CEO of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Indiana was not precipitated by an internal conflict, a spokeswoman said on Wednesday.

Big Brothers Big Sisters announced Eagan's resignation Monday. Spokeswoman Kelly Young said Eagan notified the not-for-profit's board of directors and staff members about her decision through an e-mail sent over the weekend. The resignation was effective immediately.

Young acknowledged the board was taken by surprise at the departure. Eagan had been CEO for five years.

"It was a just a personal decision she made. The board supports it," Young said. 

Darcey Palmer-Shultz, who had been overseeing strategic planning, will oversee day-to-day operations of the not-for-profit as interim chief operating officer while the board conducts a national search for Eagan's replacement.

Eagan, whose annual salary was $121,355, was previously CEO of Girls Inc. She has worked in the not-for-profit sector for 25 years.

In an e-mail to staff members, Eagan explained that she was taking a "much-needed" break, Young said. In a later Facebook post, she said she planned to spend the next six months reading, teaching, volunteering and relaxing, and that she would "regroup and experience as much laughter as possible."

Eagan did not return a call from IBJ.

Eagan oversaw a $2.4 million budget and 30 staff members. Big Brothers Big Sisters arranges one-on-one mentoring for youth, and the local organization supports 1,225 mentor relationships in Marion, Hamilton and Johnson counties.

Bryan Orander, principal of Charitable Advisors, a consulting firm that helps hire CEOs, said it's unusual for not-for-profit CEOs to quit on such short notice without having another job lined up.

“It doesn’t happen very often,” he said. "In this economy, when people feel good just to have jobs, you don't see people just stepping out."

Not-for-profit executives do burn out from time to time, Orander said. Research in the sector has found that pressure to raise money and maintaining relationships with the board of directors are frequent complaints, Orander said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT