IBJNews

Big WellPoint investor Royal Capital calls for CEO's ouster

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Royal Capital Management LLC is calling for the ouster of WellPoint Inc. CEO Angela Braly in a letter to the health insurer, saying she has “failed miserably.”

“It is incumbent upon the board of directors to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility to shareholders by changing leadership,” Royal Capital said in the letter sent Wednesday.

The New York-based hedge fund had 837,800 shares of WellPoint, the second-biggest U.S. health insurer, as of June 30, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Braly, CEO since 2007, has been under fire since cutting the Indianapolis-based insurer’s full-year forecast last month after earnings missed analysts’ estimates for the second time in three quarters. WellPoint’s share price has declined 7 percent since she because chairman in March 2010, leading two other shareholders, investment fund Orbimed Advisors LLC and hedge fund Omega Advisors Inc., to criticize the management of the company.

“The market has spoken, as evidenced by WellPoint’s stock price,” Royal Capital partners Robert Medway and John Lancefield said in the letter. Braly “has failed miserably, shareholders have paid dearly and it is time to make a change. Leadership that demands excellence, accuracy and results is needed, and she simply does not fit the bill.”

The fund owned 0.26 percent of WellPoint’s outstanding shares as of June 30, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Kristin Binns, a WellPoint spokeswoman, didn’t respond to a message seeking comment.

WellPoint shares declined 1.4 percent Thursday, to close at $57.74 each. Shares have dropped 2.9 percent in the past 12 months. Minnetonka, Minn.-based UnitedHealth Group Inc., the only U.S. plan larger than WellPoint, has gained 20 percent in the same 12-month period and increased has 58 percent since Braly took on WellPoint’s chairmanship.

“We believe there is one, and only one, explanation for WellPoint’s underperformance: well-deserved investor antipathy toward Ms. Braly as a result of a regular cadence of managerial blunders that has plagued her term as CEO,” Medway and Lancefield said in the letter. “We, of course, cannot know what additional surprises and accompanying stock price sell-offs the year has in store if Ms. Braly is allowed to stay, but the recent guidance reduction augurs poorly.”

Medway and Lance blamed the 51-year-old Braly for what they called five years of underperformance, including reduced guidance, regulatory problems with Medicare products, political fights with Democratic politicians, and departing customers.

Lancefield declined to comment beyond the letter, saying that it spoke for itself.

WellPoint owns Blue Cross plans in 14 states and is the nation’s largest seller of health policies to individuals and small businesses. Both markets have been losing customers, and are expected to become less profitable because of new rules in the health-care law. Membership in WellPoint’s medical plans fell 2.3 percent, to 33.5 million, in the second quarter from a year earlier.

Last month, WellPoint announced the $4.9 billion purchase of Amerigroup Corp. to become biggest private provider of Medicaid plans to low-income customers.

Royal Capital is the latest investor to single out Braly for WellPoint’s disappointing performance.

“There’s a universal view that the CEO is the wrong CEO to lead the business,” said Leon Cooperman, founder of New York- based Omega Advisors Inc., in an interview last month. Cooperman’s hedge fund held 2.1 million WellPoint shares as of March.

Kuhn Tsai, an analyst at Orbimed Advisors in New York, which held 1.25 million shares in March, earlier this month also attributed the company’s poor performance to “management missteps.”

The Royal Capital investors also criticized the WellPoint board, saying that keeping Braly “will be viewed as inexplicable complacency in the face of abundant evidence that change is needed.” WellPoint’s board has been meeting with investors following the release of the company’s second-quarter results on July 25.

Investors “are understandably confused as to what process the board is undertaking,” they wrote.

Braly has the support of the board, lead director Jacquelyn Ward said in a statement released after the July 25 earnings report. The directors are “fully involved in the strategy WellPoint is pursuing and is supportive of the strategy and our management team,” Ward wrote in an e-mail.

Lenox Baker, a retired cardiac surgeon who has been on the board of the Indianapolis-based insurer for about a decade, said on Aug. 10 in a telephone interview that the board backed Braly, and the pressure to remove her was being driven by short-term investors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT