Board approves revamp of Indiana teacher licensing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The state panel overseeing teacher licensing has approved new rules Indiana's state superintendent says will allow future educators to spend less time learning how to teach and more time focused on subject matter.

The Division of Professional Standards Advisory Board on Thursday approved the proposal, which had drawn sharp opposition from universities and others who said Superintendent Tony Bennett shouldn't dictate college curriculums.

The board made several changes to the proposal in an effort to compromise, and Bennett said Thursday he was proud of the final product.

"We crafted these changes with the belief that students' academic success is determined, in large part, by the quality of their teachers," Bennett said. "These new rules for licensing go further than ever before to make sure all Indiana's school children receive the high-quality instruction they deserve."

Gov. Mitch Daniels, also a Republican, also praised the new rules.

"The single best way to have better prepared kids is to have better prepared teachers," Daniels said in a statement.

The original proposal would have required elementary education majors to take no more than 30 college credit hours in teaching methods. That limit was later eliminated, a move Indiana University School of Education Dean Gerardo Gonzalez said was a fair compromise.

"The faculty really should be in charge of the curriculum," Gonzalez said. "Not having credit limits allow the faculty flexibility."

The original proposal would have required those who want to become high school math teachers, for example, to major in math and minor in education. Currently, college students can major in education and take some classes in math to qualify as secondary math teachers. Education schools complained that such a change would essentially destroy their secondary education majors.

The rule approved Thursday allows students who want to be high school teachers to major in secondary education, but only if a college's secondary education program meets or exceeds the content requirements of a specific subject major, such as math or physics. The Department of Education said that compromise worked because it still ensures that teachers learn about the subject they will eventually teach.

The rules also will make it easier for school boards to hire superintendents who have had nontraditional career paths. And they will allow current teachers to apply certain professional development programs toward license renewal, possibly saving them money on tuition-based courses.

The Department of Education said the new rules take effect July 31, but they will not affect education majors who graduate from college before 2013.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...