BOULET: Has civility become a quaint and obsolete concept?

Larry S. Boulet
May 29, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

BouletAmericans are not as civil as they used to be.

Last fall, as President Obama spoke to the members of the U.S. Senate, House of Representatives and a nationwide audience, Rep. Joe Wilson, a four-term GOP congressman from South Carolina, interrupted the president’s speech by calling him a liar.

Not too long ago, such behavior was unthinkable. Regardless of political differences, members of both parties minded their manners as a show of respect for the president.

In last year’s U.S. Open semifinal match, Serena Williams berated and physically threatened a lineswoman for calling a foot fault on the tennis star. No, it’s not unusual for tennis fans to witness bad behavior from a few star players (remember John McEnroe?), but Williams took her outburst to a new level of intimidation. And even more troublesome, her eruption came after the chair umpire had warned Williams about similar behavior.

Daily, there are doses of uncivil behavior reported by the media. And bad behavior isn’t limited to highly visible people. A recent Reuters poll reported that adults in the United States believe they are the most likely of any in the world to witness parents becoming physically or verbally abusive toward coaches or officials at their children’s sporting events.

So what if Americans aren’t as civil as they used to be?

The Institute for Civility in Government (www.instituteforcivility.org) is a not-for-profit focused on improving the civility of people in government. The institute cites the loss of civility as a primary reason for “persistent (and growing) polarization in our society along the lines of race, socioeconomic groups, religion, age, politics and special interests.” The institute views polarization as a key threat to the effectiveness and efficiency of our governing process.

Based on his remarks in a recent commencement address at the University of Michigan, President Obama agrees. He said, “We cannot expect to solve our problems if all we do is tear each other down.”

He called for “a basic level of civility in our public debate.” Like many of us, President Obama does not always practice civility. Nonetheless, can we simply ignore warnings from the president of the United States about the dangers of incivility to our governing process? Or should we instead give some consideration to the president’s call for a return to at least a basic level of civility in our public debate and elsewhere?

It’s not surprising that polarization and ineffectiveness are the products of uncivil behavior. Whether in politics, sports or the workplace, people simply don’t like working with those who treat them with disrespect, resort to name-calling, and fail to listen. But if, on the other hand, people on opposite sides of an issue feel they can safely express their views without fear of insults, threats or abuse, they are more likely to be willing to work toward finding solutions.

What really is civility, anyway?

P.M. Forni is professor and co-founder of the John Hopkins University Civility Project (later renamed the Civility Initiative) and the author of two books on civility. In “Choosing Civility,” Forni uses words and phrases collected from participants in his workshops to define civility. His list includes “consideration,” “kindness,” “trustworthiness,” “respect for others’ opinions” and “good citizenship.”

You may be thinking, “Yeah, civility sounds fine, but it’s just not practical in today’s highly competitive society, where good manners have given way to rudeness.” Or maybe you think civility is for “pushovers” or, “Nice guys finish last.”

Eric Hoffer, an American social worker and philosopher, on the other hand, says, “Rudeness is the weak man’s imitation of strength.” And Forni adds that, “Nice guys don’t have to finish last. Not if they are also smart, imaginative, dedicated and persevering. Niceness works as part of a winning combination.” Far from being the foible of nice guys, civility is powerful.

How do we become more civil?

Civility can’t be legislated or mandated. Its rebirth must begin as a grass-roots effort that starts with you and me. We can simply choose to be more civil. A good first step is to be better at listening. And this means real listening, not pseudo-listening, when you’re really just thinking of what you’ll say when the other person finally stops talking. To listen well, you must focus intently enough on what the person is saying to understand it fully.

And you can test that understanding by expressing the other person’s viewpoint in your own words. Consider it, then respond. It’s that simple, but the dividends can be huge.•


Boulet is a former PricewaterhouseCoopers partner and a consultant to public and private middle-market companies.


  • Growing a civility movement
    Mr. Boulet, Thanks so much for mentioning our work in your article. The Institute is growing steadily as more people become aware of what is at stake if civility declines. Please become a member and add your voice to the civility movement. Every person counts, and you will receive the resources and benefits of membership. Also, as you may be aware, we just held a Citizens' Civility Symposium in Washington, DC. If you send us your email address, we will be happy to alert you when the recording is posted on our website. Our thanks, Cassandra Dahnke, co-founder
  • Civility Means Business
    Dear Mr. Boulet, I wad delighted to see that you found my work relevant to your column on civility. The new issue of One, the magazine of the Carey Business School at Johns Hopkins, includes a column of mine on civility, leadership and business. May I send you a copy? Would you please email me a mailing address? Cordial regards, P.M. Forni

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.