IBJNews

BrightPoint stock sinks on lower earnings report

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

BrightPoint Inc. stock fell as much as 12 percent early Friday morning following disappointing first-quarter earnings that prompted the company to lower its 2012 financial forecast.

Shares rebounded slightly and were fetching $6.36 in late-morning trading, but nevertheless were down 9 percent from their $7 close on Thursday.

Rough conditions in the global wireless industry hurt earnings, the Indianapolis-based logistics provider reported Thursday afternoon after markets closed.

BrightPoint's net income was $3.2 million, or 5 cents per share, down significantly from $8 million, or 11 cents per share, in the year-ago quarter and from $15 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Revenue was $1.37 billion, up 23 percent from the same quarter a year ago, but down from the fourth quarter.

“We are reporting solid results in revenue and units handled for the first quarter of 2012," CEO Robert Laikin said in a prepared statement. “However, our customers and vendor partners faced significant competitive and economic pressures in the first quarter, which negatively impacted our profitability.”

BrightPoint handled 29.2 million mobile devices in the quarter. That was a 7-percent increase over the first quarter of 2011, but a 5-percent decrease from the fourth quarter.

BrightPoint said it expects per-share income for the year to range from 57 cents to 63 cents, which would be down from its previous forecast of 66 cents to 72 cents.

BrightPoint said it took $2.4 million in restructuring charges in the quarter, including the anticipated sale of its Reno, Nev., facility, plus severance expenses from downsizing. The company laid off an undisclosed number of people in its Americas division and had “continued consolidation and rationalization” in its Europe, Middle East and Africa and corporate divisions.

The company reported adjusted net income of 16 cents per share, which missed analyst estimates by 2 cents. However, it beat the average revenue estimate of $1.29 billion.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Broghtpoint
    While shareholders and REGULAR employees suffer, top management was able to increase their siphoning by 11% over 2010. When will the top pull figure out they ain't getting done as leaders and leave? Annual meeting next week and always curious when I see the directors getting paid $250,000! a year just to show up 4 times per year and, as you can see, do nothing to turn this company around. Bitter, oh yeah, since my BP stock has tanked. Good ole boy clubs more concerned aboyt their own parachutte.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT