Brokers 'devastated' by reform rule

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The decision last year by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services not to exclude health insurance brokers commissions from a provision in the 2010 health reform law has been “devastating to brokers,” broker advocate Janet Trautwein said during an August speech in Fishers, and there are signs that Congress will act to reverse the policy.

The health law caps health insurer's profits and overhead expenses at 20 percent of premiums (and only 15 percent for large employers). That threatened to cut off the livelihood of brokers, whose commissions were traditionally baked into the prices charged by health insurers to their employer clients.

The decision has accelerated a consolidation trend among Indianapolis-area brokers, in which many veteran brokers have been selling their firms.

Trautwein, CEO of the National Association of Health Underwriters, spoke enthusiastically about the possibility of bipartisan legislation passing that would declare broker commissions as neither overhead nor medical expense, but instead a transaction charge to employers.

“It should not have been part of the calculation to begin with because it is not an insurer expense,” Trautwein said of brokers’ commissions during a speech at the Fishers Hospitality & Conference Center, which hosted the annual meeting of the Indiana State Association of Health Underwriters on Aug. 19.

Of course, brokers for years have enjoyed the benefit of employers' having no idea they were being charged this extra expense, but that’s another matter.

In any case, Trautwein said, that argument was gaining traction among both Democrats and Republicans in Congress. But the brokers’ chances would be much better if the National Association of Insurance Commissioners would endorse the legislation, which is sponsored by Republican Mike Rogers of Michigan and Democrat John Barrow of Georgia.

But that’s looking less and less likely, according to an Aug. 29 report by Politico.  The insurance commissioners’ executive committee last month decided to put off further action on whether to endorse the Rogers-Barrow bill. Supporters looked for some sort of action at last week’s conference of the insurance commissioners, which was then delayed because of Hurricane Irene. But a spokeswoman for Florida Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty, chairman of the insurance commissioners’ health insurance advisers task force and one of the broker bill's biggest advocates, told Politico that no major action on the broker bill was planned for the conference.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners recommended in October that broker commissions be included as an administrative cost that counted toward the 20-percent cap. The Obama administration’s Department of Health and Human Services then incorporated that recommendation into its regulations.

But Trautwein said that Obama advisers in the White House worry the decision could force so many brokers out of business that it could undermine another key part of the health reform law: the health insurance exchanges that will serve as the main marketplace for individuals and small business to get health coverage. The exchanges will also be the place where consumers go to get subsidies for health insurance, one of the law’s key mechanisms for expanding overall health coverage.

Those exchanges are scheduled to begin operating in 2014.

“They actually want agents and brokers to remain part of the process,” Trautwein said of her contacts at the White House. “They worry that brokers and agents won’t be around in 2014 to enroll people in the exchanges.”

The room of brokers listening to Trautwein in Fishers erupted in laughter.


  • Public Has a Right to Know
    The public ultimately pays these bills and transparency about what we are paying for is very important. Yes, business needs to thrive, but not at the cost of transparency. Let's hope that the revisions consider that. Secrecy almost always leads to problems.
  • Broker Commissions Are Not Hidden
    "Of course, brokers for years have enjoyed the benefit of employers' having no idea they were being charged this extra expense, but that’s another matter."

    Another sign that the govenment is clueless. Employers not only know that the broker fees are included in their premiums, they often negotiate lower fees or added services for the fees. The government should stay out of business they obviously do not understand.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............