IBJNews

Butler still getting big bounce from 2010 NCAA run

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As Butler University men’s basketball team prepared for its fifth consecutive NCAA tournament appearance on Thursday, school officials were still measuring the positive consequences of the Bulldogs’ run to the championship game at Lucas Oil Stadium last April.

Butler dropped the title 2010 game to Duke University, but won legions of fans and an avalanche of favorable publicity.

The most memorable moment for basketball fans may be Gordon Hayward’s end-of-game shot that could have given Butler the win, but school officials said  applicants to the university remember something else.

Butler admission staff members said they heard repeatedly from potential students and their parents during high school visits last fall that their main memory of the Bulldogs’ run was that the school’s basketball players went to class the day of the NCAA championship game.

On Thursday, Butler was scheduled to play Old Dominion University in Washington, D.C. Tip time was set for 12:40 p.m. The Bulldogs, a No. 8 seed, will have a difficult time repeating last year’s tournament success, on or off the court.

In the wake of the 2010 run, men’s basketball season ticket sales increased more than 25 percent over the previous year. Average attendance at each home game during the 2010-11 season was 7,177, the highest in more than 40 years.

The number of applications to Butler has gone up 41 percent—to a total of 9,357—compared with the same time last year, according to school officials. Requests for information and campus visits by prospective students are both up 35 percent for the year.

“That’s a solid indicator of interest,” said Tom Weede, Butler’s vice president for enrollment management.

Applications from outside Indiana have increased 62 percent over last year’s figures. In-state applications rose 18 percent, Weede added.

Though Butler officials declined to discuss specifics about their financials, they said donations to Butler’s athletic programs are up significantly, and the number of undergraduate alumni giving to the school increased 10 percent over a year ago.

In October, two major Homecoming functions—the President’s Dinner and Bulldog Beauty Contest, set attendance records. Overall, alumni events are seeing more new participants.

Weede is not surprised that last spring’s tournament exposure generated more interest among college applicants.

“People knew where Butler was because they saw us in the Final Four,” he said. “No one applies to schools they’ve never heard of.”

That larger applicant pool means more competition to be one of the students Butler will accept to fill 960 freshmen seats in fall 2011, Weede said, adding that the university has extended about 200 more enrollment offers than last year, an increase of 3 percent.

Sports-business experts said the financial bounce of Butler’s success is likely a mid-seven-figure number. But the win didn’t come cheap, either.

A week after the championship game, Butler signed its men’s basketball coach, Brad Stevens, to a lucrative 12-year contract extension that experts valued at $1 million annually—nearly three times what Stevens made during the 2009-10 season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT