IBJNews

Butler University raises $12 million in campaign to refurbish historic Hinkle Fieldhouse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Butler University officials on Friday said they had raised $12 million toward a $16 million capital campaign to fund major upgrades to historic Hinkle Fieldhouse.

Built in 1928 at a cost of $750,000, the aging sports facility is about to undergo its most extensive renovation since the building began hosting basketball games shortly before the Great Depression.

Friday’s public announcement comes about 2-1/2 years after the university began targeting its traditionally larger donors during the campaign’s “silent phase.”  The original renovation plan called for $25 million in improvements but has been scaled back.

“We’ve made good, steady progress,” said Bill Lynch, Butler’s associate athletic director of development, about the university’s fundraising efforts.

To help complete the campaign, Butler said it will offer several sponsorship options. Donors can put their names on brick pavers for $500, on chair-back seats for $1,000 and on lockers for $5,000.

“We need to be a program built for eternity, because we play in a gym built for eternity,” Butler men’s basketball coach Brad Stevens said Friday morning.

A storm in August 2009 that damaged part of the building’s roof and dislodged bricks on the exterior prompted a study to determine how Hinkle could be modernized without changing its outside appearance.

As a U.S. National Historic Landmark, the building’s original structure must stay intact. University officials, for instance, can’t even upgrade its single-pane windows with double-pane replacements.

Brick tuck-pointing and window replacements already have begun.

The campaign is expected to run about a year, with the renovation lasting a few years, Lynch said.

Improvements will be made to the interior and exterior.

Season ticket holders will benefit from more chair-type seats that will be added, replacing most of the benches in the lower bowl. Chairs were first installed in 1989, which cut seating capacity from 15,000 to 10,000. Capacity will drop further, to about 8,500, after the additional chairs are installed.

A new scoreboard will be added, new restrooms installed and upgrades will be made to the locker rooms, in addition to the strength and conditioning and sports medicine facilities.

Hinkle houses physical education classrooms and offices for 19 sports, significantly more than the four sports it hosted when built, a year after Babe Ruth slugged 60 home runs in 1927.

When it was built, Hinkle was the largest basketball arena in the country, a distinction it held until 1950. The building hosted the Indiana high school basketball championships from 1928 to to 1971 and picked up a shrine-like reputation among basketball fans.

The arena has received significant national attention in recent years thanks to Butler's consecutive trips to the NCAA men's basketball championship game in 2010 and 2011.

“There’s so many great memories here,” Lynch said. “I think in that sense it’s been a fun project to work on, and I think people certainly see the need.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT