IBJNews

2012 CFO OF THE YEAR: Christie B. Kelly

Sam Stall
November 28, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Honoree, Public Companies

When she joined Duke Realty in 2009, CFO Christie B. Kelly hit the ground running. She worked with the CEO and other members of the executive team to develop a five-year strategic plan to revamp Duke’s investment portfolio, generate additional income from operations, and strengthen the balance sheet. It was no small job, given that the Indianapolis-based, publicly traded real estate investment trust owns and operates roughly 140 million rentable square feet of industrial and office assets with an aggregate value of $7 billion. And it didn’t help that all of this took place during the recession.

“At the onset of our strategic visioning, during some of the worst days in 2009, finance needed to ensure our strategic decisions were tied to reliable financial criteria and that we were understanding what our stakeholders expected of a top-performing REIT,” Kelly said. “We listened, analyzed, focused on our strengths and envisioned a more profitable and less volatile earnings profile for our company and shareholders.”

christie-kelly01-15col.jpg (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Age: 51

Family: husband John; daughter Olivia, 16; son Jack, 11

Hometown: Pittsburgh, Pa.

Education: bachelor’s degree in economics, Bucknell University

Civic Involvement: Working with special needs children; a member of Impact 100 Greater Indianapolis, which awards grants to not-for-profits in the areas of arts and culture, education, environment, family, and health and fitness

Hobbies: Family time, basketball and lacrosse

She was instrumental in increasing Duke’s investment in industrial assets from 36 percent to 54 percent, growing medical office assets from 5 percent to 9 percent, and reducing office asset investments from 55 percent to 33 percent. That shift helped improve cash flow and lower the investment portfolio’s volatility.

Kelly also directed Duke’s efforts to strengthen its balance sheet. In 2011 the company reduced its unsecured debt obligations and preferred stock by more than $615 million, provided for all of its 2012 debt maturities and bolstered its liquidity position through the renewal of an $850 million unsecured revolving credit facility. As of June 30, Duke had $107 million in cash on hand and no balance on its line of credit.

As a result, the company has outperformed other competing REITs, along with the S & P 500 and S & P 400, with more than 30 percent total shareholder return during 2012.

Kelly was also a guiding force in establishing Duke’s 18-month-long leadership development program. She’s adept not just at executing complex financial transactions, but at explaining them. And she’s plainspoken when offering her take on the economy. The country, she says, will see more of what it experienced in 2012. As for the reasons, take your pick: the European debt crisis, an anemic U.S. recovery, a possible Chinese meltdown, Middle Eastern disarray, or something unforeseen. Whatever happens, she feels that Duke will weather the storm—and provide a safe harbor for investors.•

___

Click here to return to the CFO of the Year landing page.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT