IBJNews

2013 CFO OF THE YEAR: Fred Crawford

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

HONOREE, Public Companies

If Lincoln Financial hadn’t moved, Fred Crawford might have come to Indiana sooner. He joined that company in 2001—just after it uprooted from Fort Wayne and moved to Philadelphia.

Instead, it was 2012 before the Illinois native—son of venerable Chicago newsman Bob Crawford—would find himself settling here. That’s when CNO Financial Group attracted him.

crawford-fred-15col.jpg (IBJ Photo/Eric Learned)

Age: 50

Family: wife, Priscilla; children Lauren, 21, and Matthew, 18

Hometown: Barrington, Ill.

Education: bachelor’s, Indiana State University; MBA, University of Iowa

Civic involvement: on finance committee of United Way of Central Indiana after serving as finance committee chairman and treasurer for United Way of Greater Philadelphia; on finance board of the University of Iowa School of Business, and supporter of the Iowa track and field program (having coached there during graduate school) and member of Iowa’s Tippie School of Business Finance Department Advisory Board

Hobbies: biking, golfing, visiting family cabin in Minnesota

“At the time, I knew what most knew about CNO,” Crawford said. “I knew it as Conseco, the company that went through so much drama. Unfortunately for people—for me—I hadn’t kept pace with what was going on at the company.”

When he looked, Crawford was impressed with what he found.

“One thing nice about being a sitting CFO when studying up on a company is that you can read between the lines,” he said. “I could see the chess moves and base hits that made things happen. It was the kind of decision-making and board management that really impressed me. And it added up to something significant.”

Crawford saw this as a chance to roll up his sleeves and get involved. “I had been someone who took on repair jobs. Now it was time to advance the ball.”

While his time at CNO has been short, his results are already impressive. The stock price has more than doubled in the past 20 months. (Yes, there’s been growth in the industry, but that’s closer to 18 percent.) He oversaw the early retirement of debt that led to a stock dividend. Ratings upgrades—including two from Standard and Poor’s within three months—speak to satisfaction inside and outside the company.

“You don’t come into a company and wave a magic wand,” Crawford said. “An awful lot of good things were already taking place. When I came on board, it was time to exploit many of those good decisions.”

His initial strategy involved communicating carefully with investors, getting some positive energy from ratings agencies, and working closely with the board. Since then, it’s been broadening the investor base.

“When midsize financial agencies tend to attract shorter-term and hedge-fund-type investors, we needed a broader and more traditional range of investors on the bond and stock side,” Crawford said. “We’ve been busy doing that, continuing to get upgrades as our performance improves.”

He’s also focused on putting in protections against the next financial crisis when and if it happens.

“It’s very typical for companies going through challenges to not be able to lift up their heads to look past the current crisis. Fortunately, CNO has rebuilt its financial position. Now we can boldly invest the capital to grow the business. It’s a different kind of decision-making.”

“As a CFO of a large company, most decisions don’t get to you until it’s highly complex and highly impactful on the company,” Crawford said. “Being able to sift through the complexity and make a good judgment call, to me, is the difference-maker. That’s something I spend quite a bit of time on. What’s the right call here?”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT