2013 CFO OF THE YEAR: Matthew Selig

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

HONOREE, Private Companies (Revenue $100 million or less)

The scouring-powder business and the property management business have little in common … except for Matthew Selig.

Being the finance chief for one company is difficult enough. But Selig holds down the title for two, SerVaas Laboratories—maker of the cleanser Bar Keeper’s Friend—and SerVaas Management—which oversees commercial real estate rental property with IUPUI as a primary tenant.

selig-matthew-1col.jpg (IBJ Photo/Eric Learned)

Age: 45

Family: single

Hometown: Indianapolis

Education: bachelor’s, IUPUI; MBA, Indiana Wesleyan University

Civic involvement: member of Indiana Karst conservancy, which works to preserve endangered Indiana cave sites

Hobbies: caving

“What we do in dealing with IUPUI is very different than dealing with Walmart,” Selig said.

Diversity comes with the territory in the SerVaas empire. Selig also spent time as president of SerVaas’ Saturday Evening Post Society and, he added, helped manage “five or six other companies.”

He came to the company the old-fashioned way: “I answered an ad for an accountant,” he said. “I started on the bottom.” That doesn’t mean he arrived without experience. As an infantry drill sergeant in the U.S. Army and Army Reserves, Selig adapted the philosophy that his job isn’t to inspire better factory workers or better accountants. Instead, it’s to make better leaders.

“Everyone is involved in leadership development,” he said. “If we do that well, they’ll figure out how to be good salespeople or good factory workers.”

Like any other business, his two companies faced recessionary challenges.

“In 2007, I was on a flight reading The Wall Street Journal and wondering if there was even going to be a U.S. economy when I landed,” Selig said. “We decided we were going to act like there was no recession—which we could do because we had no debt and a strong cash reserve. It was harrowing. It wasn’t fun. But we could say, ‘What can we do to take the best advantage of it?’”

He quoted Warren Buffett: “Nobody knows who’s swimming naked until the tide goes out. Well, we don’t like to swim naked around here. We want a sound financial base and we build off of that.”

The philosophy seems to have worked. During the recession, sales of Bar Keeper’s Friend continued to rise, solidifying its position (behind Comet) as the country’s number two powdered cleanser. Its continued success led to the launch of a new product, More foaming cleanser.

“A new product means nine months of money going out before the first money comes in,” noted Selig. “But since we’re allergic to debt, we want to fund R&D and pay ongoing bills without borrowing. Bankers ask if we want to borrow and we say no.”

Being financially stable during tough economic times also made it possible to take advantage of depressed real estate prices. The company moved out of its 40-year-old overcrowded digs and into a new building in Pike Township.

“We are a very small company,” Selig said. “Everyone is involved in a little of everything. This morning, I had a red pen out and was editing a product label. People who aren’t comfortable with that, they don’t do well here.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?