2013 CFO OF THE YEAR: Steve Hunnicutt

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

HONOREE, Private Companies (Revenue $100 million or more)

As CFO of Elwood staffing, Steve Hunnicutt’s influence has been much more than temporary.

He’s overseen eight acquisitions, doubling the company’s footprint and its revenue. The achievement is even more remarkable considering that three of those acquisitions occurred in the difficult economic years from 2008 to 2010—when his industry contracted 37 percent. And he’s kept the company profitable during every year of his tenure.

hunnicutt-steve-1col.jpg (IBJ Photo/Eric Learned)

Age: 40

Family: wife, Lori; daughters Morgan, 14, Lauren, 12, and Lindsey, 5

Hometown: Huntington, Ind. Education: bachelor’s, Ball State University

Education: bachelor’s, Ball State University

Civic involvement: treasurer for Terrace Lake Community Church in Columbus; board member and treasurer for New Song Mission, whose purpose is to rebuild the lives of orphaned, fatherless or impoverished children of Indiana

Hobbies: reading; outdoor activities such as camping, hiking, riding ATVs

Hunnicutt was recruited to serve as controller after working with an automotive-parts supplier as a business analyst. That previous employer had just gone through a merger, usually a volatile time.

“I thought it was not a bad idea to hear what these folks at Elwood had to say,” Hunnicutt recalled. Liking what he heard, he joined the family-owned business in 2000.

At the time, Elwood had 11 locations. Now it offers more than 220 throughout the United States and parts of Canada, employing nearly 1,000 people while keeping 27,000 temporary associates busy with more than 6,000 clients.

“It was in a growth mode,” understated Hunnicutt, who set policies for pricing, driving efficiencies, and building the financial side almost from the ground up.”

New to the industry, he quickly learned what most people don’t realize: “Most have the perception that staffing companies exist to recruit,” he said. “But much more significantly, it involves not only selection and screening and recruitment but also, once hired, essentially shifting the risk to us. We are the employer of record. If we send someone to a site and they become injured, we bear the responsibility.”

Manufacturing is still the primary area of placement for Elwood, but the company now works in distribution and logistics, oil and gas, and wind energy.

“As we’ve grown, so has our diversity,” he said. And that’s intentional. “We view it as a way to insulate against fluctuations that can hit one industry or geography. Diversity provides more stability.”

While servicing clients is vital, Hunnicutt also understands the importance of keeping his massive employee base happy.

“In any given week, we could be paying 27,000 employees in 33 states and Canada. We worked hard to build a system to minimize the risk of errors knowing that that’s not just a necessary business function but also important to employee satisfaction—which, in turn, helps us and our client companies.”

An awareness of his talent pool is vital in acquisitions as well.

“It’s tricky,” he said. “There aren’t tangible assets. There’s an employee list and a customer list. When assessing a potential acquisition, you need to understand if the information presented is accurate, you have to uncover contractual or operation issues that would indicate that the relationship would not continue. Contracts tend to be short-term, so we need to provide superior customer service.”

He noted the company’s success in retaining those clients and employees.

“We need to excite them about coming on board. And we try to make sure we have best-in-class benefits for them.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!