City seeks ideas to privatize stadium, convention center operations

Peter Schnitzler
October 20, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Indianapolis is considering ways to get out of the professional sports stadium and convention center management business.

This afternoon, the city’s Office of Enterprise Development released a Request for Information and Qualifications in conjunction with the Capital Improvement Board, soliciting proposals for private-sector operation and management of Lucas Oil Stadium and the Indiana Convention Center.

The CIB, which manages the city’s professional sports facilities and the convention center, has struggled much of the past year to close a projected $47 million deficit for 2010.  Last week, it said its financial situation has been improving, but still needs much work.

According to the RFI, Indianapolis hopes to identify efficiencies and cost savings for each facility; build relationships with strategic partners; maximize their usage; evaluate potential economies of scale; and enter into a multi-year agreement with one or more respondents for their operation.

The city’s deadline for responses is Tuesday, Nov. 24, at 4 p.m. After that, it anticipates issuing a formal request for proposals on Dec. 7, with an anticipated due date a month later.

The RFI requires respondents to provide specifics about how their proposals to operate the three venues would affect major city events, such as Indianapolis Colts games, national swimming competitions, the Circle City Classic, events sponsored by Indiana Black Expo, NCAA events, events of the Indiana High School Athletic Association and various marching band events.

It also notes that any respondent will be required to coordinate its plans with the Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association in order to attract and retain significant public events and ensure the facilities are utilized at their full capacities.

The RFI does not formally seek proposals for management of Conseco Fieldhouse, noting that stadium “is subject to an operating agreement that does not expire in the near term.”

But it leaves the door open for privatizing Conseco Fieldhouse’s management, if the Indiana Pacers consent. The RFI continues: “The City believes there is every possibility that the current operator of Conseco Fieldhouse will cooperate in identifying opportunities to achieve efficiencies, enhance performance and create benefits for the well being of the larger community.”

Whatever proposals the city receives, the RFI is careful to note that it cannot interfere with or jeopardize the tax-exempt status of bonds issued to underwrite construction of the three facilities.

Unless they’re retired early, the Indiana Convention Center’s bonds reach maturity in June 2021; Conseco Fieldhouse’s reach maturity in 2027; and bonds for Lucas Oil Stadium and the convention center’s expansion reach maturity in 2041.

The RFI refers all questions to Michael Huber, Mayor Greg Ballard’s director of enterprise development. Neither Ballard nor Huber were immediately available for comment.

CIB Chairman Robert Grand said he had no comment on the RFI and also referred questions to the mayor’s office.

Last week, CIB Treasurer Ann Lathrop said at the group’s regular meeting that the group may not need the first installment of a $27 million state loan intended to bail it out of its financial difficulties. Lathrop said the CIB’s financial situation might be improving enough that it may forego the $9 million installment in 2009, which would save the CIB from paying interest charges of 5.25 percent.

State legislators this summer authorized the CIB to receive $27 million—$9 million in annual loans the state would provide for three years—to help close the CIB’s budget shortfall.

The CIB will decide at its December meeting whether to accept the loan. Even if it turns down the first installment, it still could choose to accept the remaining funds earmarked for 2010 and 2011.

At the meeting, Grand cautioned that although the group’s finances are much improved, more work remains.

“We do know we’re healthier than we were a year ago,” he said. “But the point of the matter is, this is an ongoing issue.”


  • Fix the problem
    Why can't our elected officials fix the problems that plague this state/city? I feel that all we've seen is our officials pushing the problem on to someone else. We saw "our man Mitch" try to privatize a government function and it failed horribly. Why would this be any differnt? Once more, what does a private organization have to gain? Here's an idea....put the politics aside and FIX THE PROBLEM. It's time this mayor starts making tough decisions. It will be hard and unpopular in certain circles, but things need to get back on track. In the long run we will all be better off. THINK BIG PICTURE!
  • Private
    Anyone who thinks a government agency will be better off running something like this than the private sector is crazy. Privatize, privatize, privatize.
  • No quick fix
    Another brilliant idea from our lame duck mayor. Just like selling sponsorships to the city, this is yet another short-sighted solution to a big a problem. The future of this city depends on real solutions, not quick fixes!
  • is it any wonder
    tax us to build the stadiums, then privatize - how stupid can our leaders be?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing