IBJNews

City seeks privatization of Velodrome

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

City officials are hoping that privatizing the Major Taylor Velodrome, which now is in disrepair, will breathe new life into the cycling venue built in 1982 as a key part of Indianapolis’ efforts to become a sports capital.

The city this summer issued a request for proposals to parties interested in operating the facility. And now, according to sources within the cycling community, city officials are contemplating two finalists: Marian University, and a group of cycling coaches led by former Velodrome employee and Marian cycling coach Ken Nowakowski.

velodrome Marian University is one of two private operators vying for the Velodrome. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

IndyParks spokeswoman Paula Freund in 2009 said the Velodrome needs “$750,000 just to bring it up to standard.”

The city expects the winning suitor to cover all capital expenditures. The request for proposals lists 13 areas that need immediate attention, including the parking lot, entrance, lighting, sound system, roofing, and 2,900-person seating area.

Longtime Velodrome Manager Linda Fink was reassigned within IndyParks this fall. City officials said they hope to have a 10-year deal signed by early next year to operate the cycling track and surrounding Lake Sullivan Sports Complex northwest of downtown.

Velodrome“We’re seeking the privatization to utilize the facility to its fullest extent and offer residents and visitors a wider variety of amenities and events,” IndyParks spokeswoman Jenny Burrough said.

Burrough said there are no plans to close, demolish or sell the facility. City officials said they couldn’t comment further until they negotiate a privatization agreement.

Those in the cycling community said privatization can’t come soon enough.

“This facility has not thrived under city management,” said Mark Bettinger, president of the Central Indiana Bicycling Association, an Indianapolis advocacy group that also organizes rides around the city. “The facility has started to fall behind in its maintenance because the city has not allocated the money for it.”

The city has been discussing privatizing the Velodrome, BMX track and skate park in the Lake Sullivan Sports Complex since early 2008.

Neglected landmark

Finding a group with deep enough pockets and the desire to take on operations, maintenance and capital projects at the aging facility could be a tall order.

The city wants to maintain oversight of the landmark sports venue, but the two finalists likely want some autonomy in developing not only cycling activities but also other events that could generate revenue, Bettinger said.

The Velodrome, which hosted events for the National Sports Festival in 1982 and Pan Am Games in 1987 in addition to myriad other national and international cycling events, has seen its operating budget squeezed tight in recent years—from $102,142 in 2008, to $80,297 in 2009, and $66,136 this year.

The city’s entire parks department’s budget also has suffered, declining more than $3.5 million this year to just below $22 million.

The city has been able to generate only $31,000 to $41,000 in revenue annually from the Velodrome, most it from rent and competitions. But IndyParks officials are hopeful a private operator can make the facility self-sustaining.

Part of the revenue-generation problem stems from a lackluster effort by the city and a sponsorship policy that siphons off half of every sponsorship dollar for the overall IndyParks budget, said Bob Brooks, co-founder of the Indiana Cycling Academy, a training center and mentoring program for central Indiana cyclists.

“I don’t think there’s a shortage of people and companies willing to support the facility if you have a dedicated and qualified group to run it,” Brooks said.

Marian officials confirmed that they bid to operate the facility, but would not comment further. Nowakowski declined to comment, sighting a confidentiality agreement with the city.

Ambitious plan

In late 2008, Marian officials forwarded to the city a comprehensive plan to refurbish and transform the facility. In addition to improving the Velodrome, Marian proposed enhancing off-road riding infrastructure for BMX, mountain and cyclocross bikes, as well as a two-mile perimeter loop for walking, running and leisure riding. Combined with the trails in Marian’s EcoLab, an outdoor nature preserve of sorts, the new loop would make available a walking/hiking trail of almost five miles.

Marian, which has a national-class collegiate cycling team, also submitted plans to develop the facility as a hub to support a park-and-ride program, linking the Velodrome to downtown, the north side and other areas via a network of bike trails. The complex, the proposal said, would be connected to various points around the city via IndyGo bus lines.

It is unclear if any or all of these elements are part of Marian’s current bid.

Brian Gootee, owner of Gray Goat Sports, a cycling and fitness store on the city’s south side, said upgrades at the facility could significantly enhance the city for residents and draw visitors.

“In the 1980s, when this facility was built, Indianapolis was fast becoming a cycling mecca, then it fizzled due to lack of funding and attention,” Gootee said. “We have to make amenities a priority in this city. I can’t tell you how many times a week we’re asked where the infrastructure for bicycling in this community is. Those types of amenities are what make people want to live and work here.”

Bettinger and Marian University cycling coach Dean Peterson met with Mayor Greg Ballard last month. Bettinger said the gathering cranked up his optimism that something will get done soon.

“We have an advocate in the mayor,” Bettinger said. “He is a cyclist himself and he understands the importance of this activity and of this world-class facility. People forget, this is one of less than 20 velodromes of its caliber across the country.

“The mayor wanted to talk about the growth of our organization, bike paths and specifically developing youth cycling as a fitness activity and a sport here,” Bettinger added. “Listening to the mayor, he supports cycling and this facility. He’s simply in a situation where the city is short on funds.”

Bob Locke, a longtime cyclist and a manager for Bicycle Garage Indy, thinks better Velodrome management will lead to an increase of events featuring Olympic-caliber competition.

“This facility has a history of drawing events with national- and world-class talent,” Locke said. “But in recent years, there hasn’t been the organization to get these events planned and held here. It’s difficult to understand in a city that puts so much emphasis on sports why this facility has been so neglected.”

In June 2009, the U.S. Cycling Federation dropped plans to hold the USA Cycling Masters Track National Championships in Indianapolis that August because local organizations couldn’t come up with $18,000 to help operate the event. Instead, the competition went to Colorado Springs, Colo.

“The biggest spenders in cycling are the masters and that event draws hundreds of them,” Locke said. “That not only hurt the city’s economic impact, but is a real black eye to Indianapolis.”

The effort to privatize the Velodrome is the latest in a litany of privatization efforts by Ballard. Those efforts include everything from the city’s parking meters to attractions within Eagle Creek Park.

“The Velodrome is a very specialized facility,” IndyPark’s Burrough said. “We feel a private organization with expertise in this area could handle maintenance and facilitate upgrades to this facility’s status. It could be a key step in assuring its long-term future.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT