IBJNews

Commission to recommend more limits on local TIFs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A study commission on tax-increment financing will vote Thursday evening on a set of policy recommendations that would limit the use of TIF districts in Indianapolis.

Tax-increment financing has fueled the revival of downtown, the transformation of Fall Creek Place and growth of Dow AgroSciences’ northwest-side corporate headquarters. 

TIF districts capture growth in assessed value, thus increased property-tax revenue, to cover the cost of new infrastructure or other government spending. TIF skeptics, including Democratic City-County Councilor Brian Mahern, who created the study commission, worry that continuing to liberally use TIF districts for economic development will choke off revenue that’s already declined since Indiana capped property-tax rates in 2009.

The commission’s report is merely a set of recommendations, so it will be up to City-County Council members or state legislators to propose specific laws. If pushed by the Democrat-controlled council, some of those items would surely meet opposition from Republican Mayor Greg Ballard.

Deron Kintner, director of the Indianapolis Bond Bank and a member of the commission, thinks some of the recommendations would make Indianapolis less competitive in attracting development. Ballard’s strategy is to follow opportunities as they arise, he said.

“If it’s good for the city, it’s good for the city, and we’re going to go after it,” he said. “Other cities, other areas, they’re doing all they can to retain flexibility.”

One of the report’s 31 recommendations is to create sunset dates for TIF districts that have none. That would include the downtown TIF, which encompasses $2.6 billion of assessed value and captures $63.5 million in property-tax revenue this year.

Kintner would not want to create a sunset date on the downtown TIF, which was created in 1986 and has its last bond maturing in 2038. “I don’t know when you’re going to feel comfortable that downtown can thrive on its own,” he said.

The Metropolitan Development Commission routinely decides to release excess TIF revenue to the broader tax base, Kintner said.

Mahern took issue with the idea of leaving local government to the mercy of the Metropolitan Development Commission’s annual funding decisions.

“We don’t have flexibility to fund local government,” Mahern said in a June 21 discussion of the commission’s report. “We need this money.”

TIFs have been a widely used economic development tool since the 1980s, but cities around Indiana are probably having similar discussions about how they should use TIFs in light of the state's new tax structure, said Drew Klacik, a former Indianapolis planner and current senior policy analyst at the Indiana University Public Policy Institute.

"In a sense, the commission on TIF in Marion County is a signal," he said. "We're either going to change the role of local government, or we're going to invent a new tool."

Commission Chairman Steve Talley, a Democrat who is also chairman of the council’s metropolitan and economic development commission, acknowledged that members of Ballard’s administration disagreed with some of the recommendations but said he doesn’t expect major changes to the report that’s set for a vote Thursday evening.

“It’s been a spirited conversation,” he said.

Other members of the commission are Metropolitan Development Commission member Ed Mahern, a former Democratic legislator; State Rep. William Crawford, D-Indianapolis; Auditor Billie Breaux, a Democrat; Republican council member Jeff Cardwell; and city Controller Jeff Spalding.

Among other recommendations in the report:

— Focus the use of TIFs on blighted areas;

— Require a cost-benefit analysis as part of all TIF project applications;

— Build a TIF database and maintain TIF website for public access;

— Include representatives of local taxing units, such as schools and the library, on TIF project teams;

— Expand notice and reporting requirements to taxing units affected by TIF.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Kudos to Mahern
    TIFs here seem to be taking on characteristics of a slush fund and Councilman Mahern is to be commended for bringing things out into the light of day.
  • TIF+SCAM=GRAFTER $$
    TIF is a cronyism scam that is leaving the suburbs funding the enitre city budget while being provided minimal services while the Mayor and his grafters line their pockets. The suburbs need to get their neighborhoods set up as TIFS so they can hang onto the resources to make sure their curbs, sidewalks and other infrastructure is adequately funded.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT