A 2010 Indiana law that required everyone buying carryout alcohol to show identification, regardless of age, brought lawmakers
piles of email criticism and plenty of ridicule from senior citizens frustrated about showing identification to buy a six-pack.
But a change in the law designed to add a shot of common sense might not keep Grandma from being carded the next time she
stops to pick up some wine for dinner.
The revised law that takes effect July 1 requires that only those who appear to be younger than 40 show ID when buying alcohol.
But some retailers who embraced the stricter provisions as a way to crack down on underage alcohol sales say they're not
ready to give customers the benefit of the doubt.
"It was a good policy, it still is a good policy," said Mike Lange, operations manager at Cap N' Cork, a Fort
Wayne-based liquor store chain that will continue carding everyone in the store. "People have gotten used to it now."
In fact, the real winners in the new law might be lawmakers, who can use the changes to fend off the kinds of criticism that
gave them a post-session hangover.
"Certainly people are entitled to run their businesses the way they want to," said Rep. Scott Pelath, D-Michigan
City. "We may still get the complaints, but I will make it very clear about what the law is going to be. If you are a
World War II veteran and want to buy a bottle of wine, you're under no legal obligation to show picture ID in order to
buy it."
The state law sets a minimum standard when it comes to carding, but businesses have always been able to apply their own standards.
The question for many stores is whether consumers are so annoyed by a strict policy that they'll go somewhere else to
shop.
It's a risk retailers appear willing to take.
John Livengood, president of the Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers, urged buyers to understand why stores are sticking
with the strict policy.
"If you lose a few people because of that, maybe we'll pick up a few others who are appreciating what we're
doing," he said. "There's a worthwhile goal here."
Many retailers liked the law because clerks didn't have to make a judgment call about who appeared to be old enough to
buy alcohol.
In the six months before the 2010 law took effect, the Indiana State Excise Police reported 701 violations against businesses
that sold alcohol to minors. In the six months after the law took effect, there were 251 violations.
Fewer violations mean fewer fines for stores.
"It doesn't take many underage sales violations to add up in fines to what they might lose in business from a few
disgruntled people," Livengood said.
Many stores are still determining what policy to use. The revised law doesn't take effect until July 1, so even senior
citizens should prepare to show their ID until then.
"The fate of Western civilization probably does not rest upon this particular ID law, but people did find it to be an
annoyance and they did think it was an example of government not acting with very much common sense," Pelath said. "The
good lesson is that government, at least in this one case, is still capable of hearing complaints and acting appropriately
in response to them."

















IBJ Conversations
14 Comments
Add Comment
So, patronize the Mom and Pop store to buy any/ALL of your alcohol; the 'big boxes' don't need more of my $$$
So, patronize the Mom and Pop store to buy any/ALL of your alcohol; the 'big boxes' don't need more of my $$$
I don't see how this is such a big deal - you pull out your license, you show it to them, you pay. You already have your wallet/purse out.
The only time I can see an issue is when it's entrance to a brewhouse. Show your license, go inside.
It's not as though they're scanning in the license(s) to store all of the information in a 1984 system.
Something more of an inconvenience is when there are sub-21 cashiers at grocery stores and someone of age has to come scan the alcohol. That's not likely to change. Even that is another BFD.
There are far more things which are bigger wastes of time.
When did it become the government's role to find you employment? If the state government could pass a law that magically created jobs, I'm sure it would have done it a long time ago.
By the way, business groups widely praised the past legislature for its pro-business efforts. It probably would have accomplished more if Democrats hadn't gone on vacation for 5 weeks.
The "old" law would have prevented this.