Court: School districts can't charge for bus rides

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Franklin Township Schools violated the Indiana Constitution when it stopped busing for students and then contracted with a private group to provide the service for a fee, the Indiana Appeals Court ruled Tuesday.

But the decision will have little practical impact in the state. The Indiana General Assembly has already passed legislation that bans schools from charging fees to transport students to school and the district has resumed busing.

In its decision Tuesday, a three-judge panel relied on a previous Indiana Supreme Court ruling that says “absent specific statutory authority, fees or charges for what are otherwise public education cost items cannot be levied directly or indirectly against students or their parents.”

And the appeals court said the General Assembly “has determined that transportation to and from school qualifies as a part of a uniform system of public education.”

The Indiana Constitution’s Education Clause – which is in Article 8, Section 1 – calls for a system of common schools that are free and open to all.

Franklin Township Schools in Indianapolis has been among the districts hardest hit by recent property tax caps that limit revenue based on property values. The district – trying to balance its budget with less money – eliminated busing for the 2011-2012 school year.

It then contracted with a not-for-profit group to provide the service for an annual fee of $475 for one child. Parents could pay the fee or provide their own transportation.
In November 2011, two parents in the township filed a class-action lawsuit against the school corporation, challenging the constitutionality of its actions.

Lora Hoagland, whose two sons qualified for the federal free-and-reduced-lunch program, is one of the plaintiffs. She had opted to drive her children to and from school.

Donna Chapman, who paid the fee for busing, is the other plaintiff.

A trial court ruled in favor of the district, saying the Indiana Tort Claims Act barred the suit, that the women were not entitled to monetary damages and that the school did not violate the Indiana Constitution.

Hoagland appealed. In Tuesday’s ruling, the appeals court agreed with the trial court that the women did not have authority under the tort claims act to sue and that they were not entitled to damages.

But the appeals court reversed the trial court’s ruling on the constitutional issue. It sent the case back to the trial court to enter a judgment in favor of Hoagland and Chapman’s claims that the district’s action violated the constitution.

The district can appeal the ruling to the Indiana Supreme Court.



  • Bargaining tool
    I think this is a grat decision-now schools won't be able to frighten parents by telling them that if they don't vote for ballot measures to raise property taxes they will stop bussing students or they will have to pay for it. I bet we see a lot more ballot initiatives fail now.
  • solution to pay for fuel and drivers
    the solution if the budgets cannot afford it is to cut administrative staff pay and pay for it. They are non-essential to the operation of the school for teaching Also, quite building schools as Brownsburg has in a cluster. All elementaries should be built near population zones, not in a cluster forbusing. Schools including high schools should be close to population zones. For instance,Brownsburg is big enough for a North/South High School, Middle School, and Elementary schools, reducing if not eliminating theneed for busing. Before buses, students had towalk a mile or lessin the city limits to schools, not bused within the city limits if only 4-6 blocks from school or even a mile.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...