Daniels one of health law's loudest critics

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Just about every Republican in the country has been critical of the health reform law since President Obama signed it last week. But Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels is fast on his way to becoming critic-in-chief.

Daniels blasted the new health law last week  in a speech in Indianapolis and in a column in The Wall Street Journal.

“Our federal overlords have ruled,” Daniels wrote in the Journal on March 26. “We better start adjusting to our new status as good Europeans.”

Three days earlier, Daniels told the Economic Club of Indiana that the federal health law would not reduce the federal deficit—as predicted by the Congressional Budget Office—but expand it, while at the same time adding huge new burdens to state governments.

"This is going to be an immorally—and I choose that word carefully—immorally huge burden we're about to place on our children,” he said, according to the Associated Press.

Indiana Democratic Party Chairman Dan Parker told the Associated Press that, because Daniels oversaw the beginning of the nation’s huge budget deficits during his two years as budget director for President George W. Bush, he should watch his words about huge spending.

"Given his atrocious record as OMB director under George W. Bush, which set this nation on a course for the deficit that we've had over the last 10 years, he's the last person who should be talking about debt," Parker said.

Daniels, however, pressed on. He encouraged Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller to join a lawsuit challenging part of the new law as unconstitutional. Zoeller, also a Republican, did join that 14-state lawsuit on Monday.

Daniels also offered a few alternative ideas to the new law. In the Journal, he wrote, “Congress could have done what Republicans should suggest now: Shift to a system that allows individuals—not businesses—to buy health insurance tax free. They could also create tax credits for buying health insurance based on income and health status to guarantee everyone coverage and encourage medical care and insurance competition.”

He also repeated standard Republican proposals: allow consumers to buy health insurance across state lines and place limits on medical malpractice lawsuits.


  • Former Insurance Company Exec Critical?
    "Gambling at Rick's Place? I'm shocked!"

    For a former insurance company exec to criticize health care reform is hardly a surprise.

    If his predictions about the "harm" this legislation will do is as accurate as his fiscal predictions of the invasion of Iraq were, we'll all be just fine.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1