Daniels one of health law's loudest critics

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Just about every Republican in the country has been critical of the health reform law since President Obama signed it last week. But Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels is fast on his way to becoming critic-in-chief.

Daniels blasted the new health law last week  in a speech in Indianapolis and in a column in The Wall Street Journal.

“Our federal overlords have ruled,” Daniels wrote in the Journal on March 26. “We better start adjusting to our new status as good Europeans.”

Three days earlier, Daniels told the Economic Club of Indiana that the federal health law would not reduce the federal deficit—as predicted by the Congressional Budget Office—but expand it, while at the same time adding huge new burdens to state governments.

"This is going to be an immorally—and I choose that word carefully—immorally huge burden we're about to place on our children,” he said, according to the Associated Press.

Indiana Democratic Party Chairman Dan Parker told the Associated Press that, because Daniels oversaw the beginning of the nation’s huge budget deficits during his two years as budget director for President George W. Bush, he should watch his words about huge spending.

"Given his atrocious record as OMB director under George W. Bush, which set this nation on a course for the deficit that we've had over the last 10 years, he's the last person who should be talking about debt," Parker said.

Daniels, however, pressed on. He encouraged Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller to join a lawsuit challenging part of the new law as unconstitutional. Zoeller, also a Republican, did join that 14-state lawsuit on Monday.

Daniels also offered a few alternative ideas to the new law. In the Journal, he wrote, “Congress could have done what Republicans should suggest now: Shift to a system that allows individuals—not businesses—to buy health insurance tax free. They could also create tax credits for buying health insurance based on income and health status to guarantee everyone coverage and encourage medical care and insurance competition.”

He also repeated standard Republican proposals: allow consumers to buy health insurance across state lines and place limits on medical malpractice lawsuits.


  • Former Insurance Company Exec Critical?
    "Gambling at Rick's Place? I'm shocked!"

    For a former insurance company exec to criticize health care reform is hardly a surprise.

    If his predictions about the "harm" this legislation will do is as accurate as his fiscal predictions of the invasion of Iraq were, we'll all be just fine.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.