Circle Centre hanging in despite anchor vacancy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Circle Centre mall in downtown Indianapolis performed relatively well in 2012 considering it continued to operate with only one anchor store.

The mall lost one of its two anchors, Nordstrom, in July 2011 and has yet to fill the 210,000-square-foot vacancy. Carson Pirie Scott remains as the only anchor.

Circle Centre last year saw non-anchor sales per square foot increase to $354, a 5.3-percent increase from 2011, according to an annual operating report that mall manager Simon Property Group Inc. provided to the city.

Non-anchor retail occupancy, however, slipped to 88.3 percent in 2012, down from 91.3 percent in 2011, after teen fashion chain Hollister closed its store near the entrance to the former Nordstrom space, Simon said.

On average, Simon's more than 300 U.S. retail properties averaged 95-percent occupancy and $568 in sales per square foot  in 2012, but retail experts say it's unfair to compare the performance of urban malls with the typical suburban shopping center.

The report, provided to the city late last month, partly attributes the growth in sales per foot at Circle Centre to the Super Bowl festivities in early 2012 that drove more mall traffic. The report, however, notes that tenants continued to maintain the strong sales numbers throughout the rest of the year.

Bill French, a retail broker at Cassidy Turley, said it's encouraging that the mall maintained strong sales after the Super Bowl.

“The Super Bowl certainly was a boost, but it’s only for a short window of time,” he said. “This is a very positive sales increase. It requires a full year to substantiate those numbers.”

The city owns Circle Centre's parking garages and the land under the mall. It  paid more than half the cost of building the mall. Most of the mall itself is owned by a partnership of 20 mostly local companies, including Simon, which collects fees for management and leasing.

Simon spokesman Les Morris declined to comment on the mall's performance, saying “we’ll let the report stand on its own.”

The company also offered scant details in its report as to when the Nordstrom space might be filled.

“This is an opportunity to find a tenant or tenants that even better suit the Circle Centre shopper and will complement the entire downtown area,” Simon wrote in the report.

City officials continue to work with the company to help fill the vacancy and remain optimistic.

“We’re certainly talking very frequently with Simon,” said Deron Kintner, deputy mayor for economic development. “We knew it wasn’t going to be easy, but we’re working well together.”

Brokers say the two-story space vacated by Nordstrom probably is too large to attract another single anchor. Instead, they say Simon likely is retrofitting ground-level space along Maryland Street to attract restaurants.

“As far as any specific prospects they’re working with, I know that Macy’s has always been in discussions and Target has always been in discussions, but I don’t know if there’s been any movement on those deals,” said Gary Perel, a retail broker at Newmark Knight Frank Halakar.

Circle Center financials 2colThe city built the Circle Centre store for Nordstrom at no upfront cost to the retailer and likely would offer a similar incentive deal for a replacement.

Many retail observers figured Nordstrom eventually would abandon its downtown store after the chain added a second Indianapolis location in 2008, at The Fashion Mall at Keystone Crossing. The market is too small to support two Nordstrom stores, which tend to cater toward repeat upscale customers, not visitors, analysts say.

Unlike suburban malls, Circle Centre relies heavily on visitors and conventioneers to drive sales. But French, at Cassidy Turley, said the growth in downtown housing is contributing as well.

“I see the propensity for above average sales increases over the next few years as downtown Indianapolis continues to grow its residential base,” French said.

The vacancy-plagued fourth floor received a boost from the arrival of Brown Mackie College, which pushed the floor’s occupancy to 84.3 percent, up from 71.8 percent in 2011.

The mall last year renewed leases with AT&T, Claire’s Boutique, Colts Pro Shop, Eddie Bauer, GameStop, Hot Topic, Loft, Lucky Brand, New York & Company, Tilt, and Wet Seal.

The mall had earnings of $8.3 million in its 17th year on revenue of $22.6 million, an earnings decrease of $317,184 that Simon blamed on “an increase in property operating expenses and real estate taxes.”

The mall accounted for $6.8 million in sales taxes paid to the state, $2 million in real estate taxes and $885,780 in food and drink taxes paid to the Capital Improvement Board.


  • Target
    A two-level "urban" floorplan Target store would be great in the Nordstrom spot. Downtown residents wouldn't have to drive to Southport Rd. or Glendale; visitors could pick up any forgotten necessities & kill time; downtown workers could run errands on their lunch break. It seems logical to me, but then again I know nothing about commercial real estate. Here's hoping that whatever does replace the Nordstrom location is successful.
  • Oh Sorry
    Marshall> So sorry I was off by an hour for CVS. The point being it is ludicrous for out of town guests. Downtown isn't the downtown of 1990 where the sid walks roll up at 5pm. Anyway... I will say again, we don't need another department store ala Macy's or Nordstrom. They are anachronistic and frankly, pretty sad. If a Target can open in the former Carson Pirie Scott location on State Street in Chicago, then it can open in Circle Center, and it wouldn't be an admission of defeat like it was at Washington Square. That store would do an amazing amount of business and revitalize the mall. I get that we'll probably get one in the new development at Market Square, but the topic on the table right now is Circle Center.
  • Yes to Target ... but not at CC
    I agree that a Target is needed downtown, but not at CC. Perhaps a Macy's would be a nice fit or a Lord & Taylor. Downtown would be ideal for a CB2 as well, but those are few and far in-between.
  • Lol
    Rwh, why would you put something so ridiculous out there? There is no way that's "the reason" Macy's wouldn't come to CC, lol.... And you write it as though you've got the inside scoop. Please... Nick, Target would be great downtown, but NOT at CC. We'll have our downtown Target within the next two years... And btw, CVS closes at 7 within the mile square, not 6. Barbara I'm all for a furnishings store downtown but PLEASE not IKEA!!! Their prices keep increasing but their quality, sadly, does not. Crate n barrel, cb2, pottery barn, west elm, DWR... Something along those lines....
  • Circle Centre
    Mark my words, Circle Centre will cease to exist within 10 years. Just like so many other urban malls in Columbus, etc.
  • dept store
    Hard to believe that IKEA would be interested in a downtown location, with the amount of space they require. Would be nice to have a dept store other than Macys.
  • Reply To rwh
    RWH, you have it a little backwards. Getting that space filled would help improve the issues with the teens because increase foot traffic, especially from an operation like target as others suggest, naturally helps abate these kinds of issues.
  • Macy's Not Interested
    Apparently sources at Macy's say they are not interested in the space at Circle Centre Mall due to the trouble the mall has had on the weekends with teens. This problem needs to be resolved prior to any store wanted to move in. I vote for Dillards that would be new to Indy and the region.
  • IKEA?
    I know exactly what we need David Simon. An IKEA! Pretty please?
  • Department Stores
    I get frustrated when people want "different" anchor stores. The reality is that since the mid-80s, if not before the consolidation, anchor stores have been al most exactly the same. You could slap Dillards on a Macy's and no one would know the difference. Sure, when you go upper tier like Lord & Taylor or Saks, there is a difference (in price tag), but the fact is that department stores are in their death throws. As a downtown resident, we need a Target or something useful to us, and you can bet a Target would get amazing convention traffic, too, since CVS closes down at 6pm on weeknights downtown. It is at least a 15-20 minute drive for us to get to a Target, btw. Does it need to be in the Mall, not necessarily, but that does not mean there isn't a need. Either way, it is time for whomever to carve up that space and get it leased.
  • HUH?
    Ample Targets? huh??? I live downtown, and there ain't no Targets anywhere close for downtowners.
  • Hopefully for an anchor unique to the Indianapolis market
    Since we already have ample Macys and Targets in this market, I would really love to see a different department store go into the old Nordstrom space.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

    2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

    3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

    4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

    5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............