IBJNews

Developer targets long-empty College Avenue retail building

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A 1927 retail building a few blocks north of Massachusetts Avenue is poised for revival after sitting empty more than 30 years.

Teagen Development Inc. has a purchase agreement for the 6,600-square-foot building at 1101 N. College Ave., rescuing it from an attempt—since withdrawn—to demolish the structure.  

John Thompson, who has owned the property since 2005, applied to the Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission in August for permission to raze the building, the roof of which caved in within the last 18 months.

IHPC has jurisdiction over and typically frowns upon the demolition of buildings that fall within the city’s designated historic districts. The building at 11th and College is in the northeast corner of the Chatham Arch historic district and is just south of the Old Northside historic district.

REW College retail building 15colThe building at 11th and College has seven storefronts and originally housed a grocery, barbershop, shoe repair business and laundry. (IBJ Photo/Perry Reichanadter)

Thompson withdrew the request to demolish when Teagen principal Larry Jones stepped forward to buy the building. Jones said he has agreed to pay “in the mid-five figures.”

Jones is no stranger to successful infill retail projects in urban neighborhoods. His company developed the Chatham Center, a building at Ninth and East streets with 9,100 square feet of retail space and 11 apartments. He also developed Lincoln Park Shops at 25th Street and Central Avenue and is a partner in the entity that bought and improved the Murphy Art Center, a 44,000-square-foot building at 1043 Virginia Ave. in Fountain Square.

The building at 11th and College has seven storefronts and originally housed the Great A&P Tea Co., a barbershop, a shoe repair business and a laundry. Over the years, it also housed restaurants and a delicatessen.

Jones anticipates leasing to three to five tenants and charging about $14 a square foot, less than the $19 he charges at Chatham Center about four blocks away. The lower rent is an acknowledgement that the property, immediately south of an interstate overpass, isn’t one that will benefit from pedestrian traffic.

“I’ve got to keep the rents down to attract tenants who will attract people to that corner,” Jones said. He noted the corner has good vehicular access from 11th and College.

A fresh produce and specialty foods retailer is Jones’ top choice for the space, but he thinks it could have appeal for small office users or service providers, such as a quick-shipping office.

Jones has a couple of hurdles to clear before executing the purchase. Though the property is zoned for commercial use, it doesn’t have dedicated parking. He’s had preliminary discussions with the city about allowing parking on a dead-end spur of 11th Street that extends east from College.

Because the building once housed a laundry, he’s also awaiting the results of environmental testing being conducted by Alt & Witzig Engineering Inc. to find out the extent of any clean-up that could be necessary.

Provided the parking and environmental issues are resolved, Jones anticipates restoring the building façade and keeping the distinctive green roof tiles. The back of the building would be rebuilt within the existing footprint. Blackline Studio, a local architecture firm, is drawing up plans.

Donna Hovey, a retail broker with the local office of CBRE, thinks the project will succeed if Jones can finalize the deal.

“He did a superb job on the Chatham Center project,” said Hovey. Jones has been successful, she said, because he knows the neighborhoods he works in and doesn’t get greedy with his rates.

She said the price point will compare well to some spaces on nearby Massachusetts Avenue that are asking $25 a square foot.

Besides benefitting from the nearby historic neighborhoods, the project could take advantage of its location just a few blocks east of the south end of the Monon Trail, Hovey said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wahoo!!
    This is excellent news - fingers crossed for a local coffee house :)
  • I walk that way all the time
    I disagree with the comment that it won't benefit from foot traffic. I think the surrounding neighborhoods would love a coffee shop or sandwhich place a little closer to home. I know I would.
  • Yeah!
    Larry Jones, thank you from everyone who loves that little building!
  • About Time!
    I used to live in the Van Rooy apartments across the street from there in 1997, and I always wondered why no one took advantage of what looks like relatively good bones (pre-roof collapse, of course). Kudos to him. I would imagine the foot traffic alone would keep a small grocery in business since it is right in the middle of Marsh and Kroger. If I still lived there, I would probably had been there all the time!
  • Kudos
    Kudos to Larry Jones for investing in existing real estate that caters to cost conscious start ups. Larry does an excellent job of rebuilding these types of properties without cutting corners on quality. Projects like this do a lot more for the betterment of neighborhoods and social good than for the owners wallet. Kudos Larry, may the redevelopment Gods bless you with no environmental issues and brisk permitting.
  • This is really good news
    "A fresh produce and specialty foods retailer is Jones’ top choice for the space" COOL. We live three blocks away. Give us a business that we can visit once a week and we'll be there.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT