IBJNews

Developer zeroes in on troubled Irvington site

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A developer that wants to replace a vacant Irvington motel with an $8.7 million apartment building could get permission as early as next week to clear the site for redevelopment.

Investors with ties to Meyer-Najem Construction Co. are partnering with the not-for-profit Irvington Development Organization to build approximately 50 one- and two-bedroom apartments at the site of the former Indy East Motel at 5855 E. Washington St.

The city revoked the motel’s license to operate in 2006 and shut it down in January 2009 over complaints from neighbors and law enforcement officials that the business was a magnet for crime. The site is considered key to the ongoing redevelopment of Irvington’s commercial district.

But the apartment project, which could also include ground-level retail or office space, can’t move forward until IDO gets authority from the Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission to raze the old motel.

IHPC signs off on alterations to building exteriors in the Irvington historic district. It was poised to grant permission to demolish the motel at a hearing earlier this month, but the preservation group Indiana Landmarks asked that the decision be delayed.

Marsh Davis, Landmarks’ president, said his group is now satisfied that demolition is justified and has decided not to oppose it. “We just wanted to have a conversation about the project,” said Davis, who said his group hopes to provide design assistance.

Landmarks’ decision should clear the way for demolition to be approved at the Oct. 5 IHPC hearing, said Amandula Anderson, executive director of IDO.

Anderson said her group got a conditional deed on the property in late July from the office of the Marion County treasurer after no one bid on the site in a county tax sale. The treasurer’s office granted the deed on the condition that a development plan be finalized within a year and that the project is financed by selling state-issued tax credits. IDO is to pay the county $120,000 for the site once the project is financed.

An application for the tax credits is to be filed with the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority by Nov. 1. The development team expects to hear by March 1 if it has approval to sell the credits.

Tom Peck, executive vice president of real estate for Meyer-Najem and one of the partners in the project, said his group has been working with IDO on plans for the site for about 10 months. The group includes Antone Najem, a son of Meyer-Najem principal Anthony Najem, and could include other construction company executives, Peck said.

The project is being designed by One 10 Studio, an Irvington-based architecture firm.

Anderson said her group reviewed three unsolicited proposals for the site before deciding to endorse the proposal from Peck and Najem. Good News Ministries tried but failed to rally community support to turn the existing building into a shelter for homeless families, and local developer Chris Piazza proposed renovating the structure for live/work artist studios.

The apartment proposal stood out, Anderson said, because Meyer-Najem has been involved in other projects in Irvington and because IDO would have an ownership stake. That would be a first for 9-year-old IDO.

Redevelopment of the site would coincide with other projects that are transforming the east-side neighborhood’s commercial district.

Ossip Optometry bought a building at 5606 E. Washington St. in July and is to begin renovating it next month. It will house the upscale eyewear chain’s 15th retail store when it’s finished in the first half of next year.

Black Acre Brewing Co. has started renovating a 2,200-square-foot retail space just east of the Ossip building, where it plans to open a small brewery and tasting room. And a $2.9 million makeover of the East Washington streetscape is to begin next spring. That project, which was to have started this fall, will be rebid in November, Anderson said.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 3 Years
    It took the city 3 years to shut down a motel after the license was revoked?
  • Awareness
    Find out more about Piazza's proposed "Irvington Artist Colony" on Facebook.
  • Just curious...
    what other Irvington projects has Antone Najem done?

    Do we really need more apartments? Washington already has so many, some that are boarded up.

    Have we filled up all our retail spots?

    An Artists' Colony with gallery space would be wonderful!!
  • Because...
    there just isn't enough low-income rental housing on the east side of Indianapolis. Right? Irvington is just so expensive that it's becoming a bastion of the super-rich and the working poor are being pushed out?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT