Developer zeroes in on troubled Irvington site

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A developer that wants to replace a vacant Irvington motel with an $8.7 million apartment building could get permission as early as next week to clear the site for redevelopment.

Investors with ties to Meyer-Najem Construction Co. are partnering with the not-for-profit Irvington Development Organization to build approximately 50 one- and two-bedroom apartments at the site of the former Indy East Motel at 5855 E. Washington St.

The city revoked the motel’s license to operate in 2006 and shut it down in January 2009 over complaints from neighbors and law enforcement officials that the business was a magnet for crime. The site is considered key to the ongoing redevelopment of Irvington’s commercial district.

But the apartment project, which could also include ground-level retail or office space, can’t move forward until IDO gets authority from the Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission to raze the old motel.

IHPC signs off on alterations to building exteriors in the Irvington historic district. It was poised to grant permission to demolish the motel at a hearing earlier this month, but the preservation group Indiana Landmarks asked that the decision be delayed.

Marsh Davis, Landmarks’ president, said his group is now satisfied that demolition is justified and has decided not to oppose it. “We just wanted to have a conversation about the project,” said Davis, who said his group hopes to provide design assistance.

Landmarks’ decision should clear the way for demolition to be approved at the Oct. 5 IHPC hearing, said Amandula Anderson, executive director of IDO.

Anderson said her group got a conditional deed on the property in late July from the office of the Marion County treasurer after no one bid on the site in a county tax sale. The treasurer’s office granted the deed on the condition that a development plan be finalized within a year and that the project is financed by selling state-issued tax credits. IDO is to pay the county $120,000 for the site once the project is financed.

An application for the tax credits is to be filed with the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority by Nov. 1. The development team expects to hear by March 1 if it has approval to sell the credits.

Tom Peck, executive vice president of real estate for Meyer-Najem and one of the partners in the project, said his group has been working with IDO on plans for the site for about 10 months. The group includes Antone Najem, a son of Meyer-Najem principal Anthony Najem, and could include other construction company executives, Peck said.

The project is being designed by One 10 Studio, an Irvington-based architecture firm.

Anderson said her group reviewed three unsolicited proposals for the site before deciding to endorse the proposal from Peck and Najem. Good News Ministries tried but failed to rally community support to turn the existing building into a shelter for homeless families, and local developer Chris Piazza proposed renovating the structure for live/work artist studios.

The apartment proposal stood out, Anderson said, because Meyer-Najem has been involved in other projects in Irvington and because IDO would have an ownership stake. That would be a first for 9-year-old IDO.

Redevelopment of the site would coincide with other projects that are transforming the east-side neighborhood’s commercial district.

Ossip Optometry bought a building at 5606 E. Washington St. in July and is to begin renovating it next month. It will house the upscale eyewear chain’s 15th retail store when it’s finished in the first half of next year.

Black Acre Brewing Co. has started renovating a 2,200-square-foot retail space just east of the Ossip building, where it plans to open a small brewery and tasting room. And a $2.9 million makeover of the East Washington streetscape is to begin next spring. That project, which was to have started this fall, will be rebid in November, Anderson said.



  • 3 Years
    It took the city 3 years to shut down a motel after the license was revoked?
  • Awareness
    Find out more about Piazza's proposed "Irvington Artist Colony" on Facebook.
  • Just curious...
    what other Irvington projects has Antone Najem done?

    Do we really need more apartments? Washington already has so many, some that are boarded up.

    Have we filled up all our retail spots?

    An Artists' Colony with gallery space would be wonderful!!
  • Because...
    there just isn't enough low-income rental housing on the east side of Indianapolis. Right? Irvington is just so expensive that it's becoming a bastion of the super-rich and the working poor are being pushed out?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.