Indiana device makers absorbing Obamacare excise tax

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Medical-device companies in Indiana are finding that they cannot pass on the new medical-device tax created by Obamacare to their hospital customers, causing them to continue to make cuts and to look to foreign markets for more profitable growth.

But since the 2.3-percent excise tax on sales of all medical devices in the United States took effect Jan. 1, device-makers have talked more about how they’re surviving the tax, rather than railing against it.

For Warsaw-based Zimmer Holdings Inc., the tax will claim $50 million per year, starting in the second half of this year. That’s equivalent to 43 percent of total cash flow last year—although it’s lower than Zimmer’s initial estimate of $60 million per year in tax.

Bloomington-based Cook Group Inc. will pay $14 million in additional taxes this year, taking its effective tax rate from more than 30 percent now to more than 50 percent this year, said Cook spokesman John Eckberg. However, Cook’s tax hit is also lower than its earlier estimates of $20 million to $30 million.

And for companies like Nanovis LLC, a startup maker of orthopedic implants in Columbia City, the tax makes it harder to see a path to profitability.

“Usually, when we go into a hospital and say, 'Here’s our price list and here’s where we’re willing to discount to,' the hospitals say, ‘Well, that’s not enough,’" said CFO Brian More. “The tax doesn’t ever have a chance to come into it.”

The device tax is one of numerous taxes levied by the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, to help pay for an expansion of health insurance to millions of additional Americans.

Device makers have complained about the tax since it was proposed because it is assessed on sales—no matter if the company is making profits or not.

For Nanovis, which has only three employees and has yet to turn a profit, the tax represents a major headwind to its growth plans. The tax is due even when companies distribute free samples of new products—as Nanovis plans to do later this year.

“There’s even a chance where you end up paying the tax and you’ve got no revenue,” More said. “But, as with a lot of things in Indiana and the U.S., we will figure it out and we will survive.”

Zimmer executives talk in the same way. They reduced their profit forecast for this year as much as 19 percent—even though Zimmer figured out a way to account for only half the tax’s impact in 2013.

“We have also said all along that 2013 did not provide the same kind of opportunity for operating leverage as other years since, as you very well know, we are in a position in 2013 to have to absorb the medical-device excise tax,” James Crines, Zimmer’s chief financial officer, said during a January conference call in response to a question from Derrick Sung, a medical-device analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.

But Zimmer has a plan to cut costs to absorb the tax, as well as downward trends in pricing due to increased negotiating leverage from hospitals, which are desperate to find cost savings due to Congress’ cuts to their reimbursement rates.

Zimmer is in the middle of plans to cut $400 million in costs by 2016. It is achieving those cuts via layoffs, such as the 50 it announced last week, and by ending some product development programs.

“Obviously, we have to use those savings to absorb the medical-device excise tax,” Crines said, “but we're also using those savings to accelerate certain technology and product development programs, to cover short-term dilution from these recently completed acquisitions, and to support the continuing buildout of our emerging market businesses and to fund expansion of our global sales channels.”

For its part, Cook already backed off on plans to build five new factories in Indiana, each employing about 300 workers.

Cook and other device-makers say they are introducing new products in European or Chinese markets first, and will either bring them to the United States later or perhaps not at all.

Not every medical-device company in Indiana is affected by the tax. Officials at Micropulse Inc., a supplier to the Warsaw orthopedic makers, said they have had some compliance costs to prove the company does not owe the excise tax. The same is true at Miami Tool & Dye near Fort Wayne, which supplies gauges and fixtures to medical-device makers.

“We have not seen any effect from it,” said Vice President Joy Conley. However, she acknowledged, there could be a “trickle down” in the future, if device manufacturers have to cut corners because of the tax.


  • This is a great read.
  • Two Comments
    (1) Jeb, you are a sicko! (2) If Koch's $14 million in additional taxes took them from a 30-percent tax rate to a 50-percent tax rate, the multi-billion dollar company headed by a billionaire is not paying much tax to begin with. In addition, the medical device market is not subject to highly elastic demand and companies like Koch will pass on the tax to the consumers/patients who need the products.
  • Jeb
    Jeb, your a little sick in your comments.
  • Greed...
    If they go overseas it's because of greed. The same reason they lay people off or cut hours to keep from paying medical insurance.
  • Job destroyer
    Obamacare is destroying medical device jobs which are now likely to go overseas. Why stay in the US if you don't have this tax when you relocate our of the country?
    • Exaggerated
      The device makers are just blowing smoke. Look at Zimmers financials: The $50MM is only 6.6% of their net income for 2012. They note the 43% of cash flow but they bought back $438MM in stock. It is like a small sales tax - it is minuscule in the grand scheme - they are just crying.
      • Jobs
        Nobama's healthcare plan was designed to cut jobs...this is how you become more dependent on his highness. There is not one thing positive about Nobama's healthcare plan....nothing!! My wife works in retail and they are simply cutting their employees hours down to 27 per week so they do not have to offer health insurance. SOCIALIST TAKE MONEY FROM THE PEOPLE, AND THIS IS WHAT THIS FOREIGN PRESIDENT IS DOING WITH ALL HIS LEGISLATION!!! Why are the dumbocrats buying into his rhetoric...because he is O-K with gay marriage, because he is O-K with partial birth (live) abortions, because he is O-K with illegal aliens coming across our boarders in droves allowing them to live here without becoming naturalized citizens, because he is a foreigner himself, because he does not want anyone, including law abiding citizens to have guns...What the heck is it dumbocrats? Do you think us hard working, tax paying, American citizens should pay all your bills, and this moron, Nobama, thinks that way as well? WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        Post a comment to this story

        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

        2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

        3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

        4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

        5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.