Doctors want to improve state drug-tracking system

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Doctors in Indiana overwhelmingly prescribe controlled substances for pain and other symptoms but infrequently use an electronic system designed to detect prescription drug abuse, a study released Monday found.

The findings presented to the state Board of Pharmacy by Indiana University's Center for Health Policy show that nearly 90 percent of Indiana's doctors and dentists said they had prescribed controlled substances within the past year. And while most doctors said they used the INSPECT drug tracking system, only about 20 percent said they had used it within the past month.

Many said they simply didn't have time to check the system every day.

While most doctors and some dentists said they had heard of INSPECT, only 12.7 percent use it on a daily basis, said Dr. Eric Wright, a Georgia State University professor who formerly was with the Center for Health Policy. However, one reason may be that they have to wait seven days for the results. A substantial number of doctors said they wish the system would let them know instantly whether a patient is obtaining the same prescriptions from multiple sources.

Most of the 6,000 doctors, dentists, pharmacists and others who replied to the survey said they were aware of the system and the problems with it, but said they wanted to know more. And while many saw room for improvement, they didn't always agree on how to improve the system.

"Everyone recognizes the problem, but there's no consensus on what the guidelines should be," Wright told the board.

Since 2004, the system has allowed doctors and pharmacists to determine whether patients are obtaining multiple prescriptions of powerful painkillers and other drugs that are often abused. Prescription drugs were blamed for 718 overdose deaths in Indiana in 2011, a nearly 10-percent increase from 2010's 654 deaths.

Doctors said they prescribed controlled substances to about 20 percent of their patients to help them manage chronic pain, Wright said.

"Hydrocodone is extremely popular," said Master Indiana State Trooper Tamara Watson, who was sitting in the audience during the study presentation. "It's popular because it's overprescribed."

Watson is a former undercover drug officer and a member of the attorney general's "Bitter Pill" task force against prescription drug abuse. She said it's difficult for physicians to determine when patients are faking certain symptoms such as pain or depression for which controlled substances are often prescribed.

Wright said many physicians were concerned about their patients' privacy and wished police would be required to get a court warrant before delving into the system. Many had similar concerns about state-centralized control, such as a requirement that they use the system to check on every patient.

"They were very concerned about trying to run a private practice from the Statehouse," Wright said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing