Duke fires Indiana chief, lawyer after ethics flap

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Energy Corp. has fired the president of its Indiana operations and a staff attorney following an ethics flap over its dealings with state utility regulators.

Duke spokeswoman Angeline Protogere on Monday confirmed the company had fired Indiana president Mike Reed and attorney Scott Storms, who both formerly worked for the state regulatory commission. A Securities and Exchange Commission document filed by Duke on Monday also verified the firings.

Protogere said Duke notified its employees of the dismissals in an internal memo. The Associated Press wasn't immediately able to find phone numbers for Storms and Reed, and Protogere said she couldn't provide contact information.

Duke's SEC filing said Douglas F. Esamann would replace Reed. Esamann had been interim president of the Indiana operations since October 11, after Reed and Storms were suspended.

Duke's action came about a month after Gov. Mitch Daniels fired commission Chairman David Lott Hardy for allowing Storms to handle matters related to Duke while he pursued a job with the Charlotte, N.C.-based company.

The State Ethics Commission initially approved Storm's September move to work at Duke but later filed formal charges against Storms for negotiating the job while participating in decisions involving a nearly $3 billion coal-gasification plant the utility is building in southwest Indiana. Storms is scheduled to appear before the Ethics Commission on Thursday to answer questions about the controversy.

Duke CEO Jim Rogers told the commission last week he was confident Storms exerted no influence on decisions regarding the Edwardsport plant.

Duke suspended Storms and Reed last month pending the completion of a review by outside counsel. Reed became president of Duke Energy-Indiana in June, about 16 months after leaving the utility commission as its executive director.

A copy of the internal memo obtained by The Associated Press said Duke decided to fire Reed and Storms after "careful consideration" of the legal review's findings.

The Duke memo also said the company would change its hiring guidelines to "ensure that job candidates linked to regulatory and oversight groups are removed from all Duke Energy affairs prior to being considered for opportunities."

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission has opened its own investigation into the ethics controversy and said it will review four years of cases regarding the Edwardsport plant.

Watchdog group Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana has called for cancellation of the project. In July, Storms signed off on Duke's request to pass the rising costs of the plant, which is about 70 percent complete, on to its Indiana customers.

The project's costs initially would raise their bills by about 16 percent.


  • Say that again?
    My question to Duke is how do you plan to go about ensuring that potential job candidates working for the IURC/similar organizations are no longer working on your cases? You will have to tell the IURC that you are interested in pursuing an employee before you even decide if you're going to hire the person. Isn't that a bit of a stretch?

    If I wanted to work for Duke but worked for the IURC, I sure as heck would not want you telling my boss that I'm thinking of leaving unless you were darn well going to give me the job. How else do you plan on getting me off of your cases?
  • "Flap" is a scandal
    Considering at least the the ratepayer money involved, the public trust at stake, and number of heads that have recently rolled, the term "flap" scarcely captures the import.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ