IBJNews

Emmis turns to Zell to finance repurchase of stock

Scott Olson
November 11, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A fund affiliated with Chicago real estate tycoon Sam Zell is providing financing that will allow Emmis Communications Corp. to repurchase tens of millions of dollars of its preferred stock at a huge discount—-the latest bid by the heavily leveraged company to gain financial breathing room.

Under the plan announced Friday, the Indianapolis-based media company will repurchase the shares from certain unidentified holders of the preferred stock for less than the current market price of $16 a share.

The preferred stock already is trading at a deep discount, in part because of investor anxiety over the company's heavy debt load. In addition, because of its financial struggles, Emmis has suspended making its quarterly dividend payments on those shares since October 2008. The payments normally would total more than $2.4 million a quarter.

The company has $140 million in preferred stock outstanding. However, based on the current price, those shares are trading for just $42 million.

Even after buying back preferred stock, however, Emmis still would be saddled with hundreds of millions of dollars in long-term debt.

“It’s not like this gets [Emmis] out of the hot water, in terms of their overall leverage situation,” said Mark Foster, chief investment officer of Columbus-based Kirr Marbach & Co. “But it looks like it improves it.”

He added: "The owners [of the preferred stock] may say, 'This is better than nothing. Let's take it and move.'"

In October, Emmis said that for the first six months of its fiscal year, it lost $13.1 million on revenue of $125.8 million, compared with a loss of $6.3 million on revenue of $126.9 million during the same period in 2010.
 
To finance the preferred stock purchases, Emmis is borrowing up to $35 million from Zell, which it will need to pay back by February 2015, at an annual interest rate of 23 percent..

While the interest rate may seem high, Emmis apparently expects to more than offset those costs by reducing its future obligations on the preferred stock.

“There would be a cash-flow savings and an interest savings,” Foster said. “It would appear to make some sense to do.”

Emmis’ struggles to pare down its debt have weighed on the company’s stock price for years.

Company shares traded Friday morning at 86 cents each, up 10 cents from their opening price, perhaps bolstered by the plan to purchase the preferred stock.

In September, the NASDAQ exchange warned Emmis for the third time in two years that its stock could be delisted.
 
The stock had closed below the exchange’s minimum $1-per-share requirement for 30 straight business days. Emmis shares would have to rise to at least  $1 for at least 10 consecutive business days before Feb. 27 to stay in compliance.

Emmis recently completed the sale of three big market radio stations, generating $120 million in cash, with much of it going toward repaying debt. Emmis CEO Jeff Smulyan said in September that he expects the debt reduction will push the stock above $1 again.





 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT