IBJNews

EnerDel parent expresses major cash-flow concerns

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Auditors are reviewing whether struggling lithium-ion battery maker Ener1 Inc. has enough cash to continue operations.

New York-based Ener1 employs almost 400 workers in the Indianapolis area at its EnerDel subsidiary.

“In my opinion, we do have liquidity for the rest of the year,” Ener1 Chief Financial Officer Jeffrey Seidel told IBJ Wednesday.

Seidel still has to convince the accountants. Ener1 agreed to restate its earnings for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2010, and for the quarter ended March 31 this year to reflect losses related to electric car maker Think Global, which went bankrupt in June.

The restatement, issued Tuesday, drove Ener1's stock price to a 45-cent per-share closing price. It dropped another 2 cents per share on Wednesday.

As part of the restatement, Ener1 disclosed to investors that the adjustments were “the result of one or more material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.”

Ener1 also disclosed that it is “in the process of determining whether the company has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations.”

Such notices are “very concerning” to an investor, said George Farra, an investment adviser at Woodley Farra Manion Portfolio Management Inc. in Indianapolis.

Ener1 wrote off its $73 million investment in Think in May. Ener1 had been the exclusive supplier for Think, a privately held Norwegian company that began assembling its City car in Elkhart last year. Ener1 also became one of Think’s key financial backers.

Seidel said he had planned to place $32 million of Think's unpaid loans and accounts receivable in a joint-venture structure in the second quarter. However, Ener1 delayed filing its second-quarter earnings statement while auditors finished their analysis.

As a result, Ener1 agreed to record its entire loss from Think in the fourth quarter of 2010. That pushed the net loss for the fiscal year up to $165.3 million, instead of $68.8 million.

The net loss for the first quarter dropped to $20.5 million, instead of the previously stated $84.7 million.

Ener1, which was founded in 2002 and went public in 2008, has not turned a profit, and it’s operating on various credit arrangements. Seidel acknowledged that the accounting problems, specifically the late filing of the second-quarter financial statement, could trigger a default.

He said he hoped to have matters resolved soon, but declined to speculate on the exact timing.

Ener1 hasn’t made any recent changes to its operations or personnel, Seidel said. “That’s the irony of it. We believe our current portfolio’s never been stronger. Our prospects are sound.”

Ener1 also assembles batteries for use on the Russian electric grid, buses in China and an all-electric motorcycle.

“Given a chance, this company can turn itself around quite nicely," Seidel said.

Ener1 has attracted millions in federal grants and state and local tax incentives, based on its technology and growth plans. It received a $118.5 million federal matching grant, and it’s eligible for $21.3 million in tax incentives from the state of Indiana, based on plans to hire hundreds of people at its Mount Comfort facility.

Ener1 had about 380 employees in Indianapolis, Noblesville and Mount Comfort in March of this year. At that time the company trimmed its work force because Think slowed production.

Think had just begun assembling cars for North American production in Elkhart this year. Boris Zingarevich, the Russian industrialist who backs Ener1, bought Think out of bankruptcy in July.

EnerDel was formed in Indiana in 2004 when Ener1 began acquiring the lithiom-ion battery operations of Delphi Corp.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Too Bad
    Company seemed to be heading the right direction. The THINK City could be purchased for $19k brand new, with all the tax credits. I have no idea the quality of it though. Would be nice to never have to visit a gas station again.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT