IBJNews

Indiana electric car company gets new owner

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A company that has been making electric cars at a northern Indiana factory has a new owner, giving local officials more confidence in its future.

Think North America spokesman Brendan Prebo said the company's assets are being transferred to the buyer. The company intends to get the necessary auto parts and resume production at the factory in Elkhart in 2012.

Production has been halted there since at least April because of the financial troubles that led Norway-based Think Global to seek bankruptcy protection last month.

Elkhart Mayor Dick Moore said he feels much better about the factory's prospects.

Think started initial production in Elkhart last year. The company planned for the factory to have some 400 workers by 2013 making about 2,500 cars annually, but now has 11 employees on its payroll.

New York-based Ener1 Inc., which engineers and makes batteries in the Indianapolis area at its EnerDel subsidiary, had a $73 million stake in Think, but told investors in May that it would write off its losses.

Think said the court-appointed bankruptcy trustee selected Russian entrepreneur Boris Zingarevich as the winning bidder for the company.

Zingarevich has been a major investor in Ener1 since 2002 and provided bridge funding for Think while the company attempted a reorganization before filing for bankruptcy.

A statement from the company says Zingarevich has signed a memorandum of understanding with Ener1 and Finnish manufacturer Valmet Automotive Inc. to cooperate in relaunching Think. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT