Ex-Dow Agro scientist pleads guilty in espionage case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Former Dow AgroSciences researcher Kexue Huang pleaded guilty Tuesday morning to sending trade secrets worth millions to China and Germany.

Federal Judge William Lawrence in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis accepted Huang’s guilty plea but did not set a sentencing date.

Lawrence said Huang could face the potential of 70 months to 162 months in prison. The eventual sentence will be offset by factors that include time served and an apparent absence of previous criminal history.

Chinese-born Huang, 48, was shackled in chains and flanked by two defense attorneys in the Indianapolis courtroom.

“Would you, as best you can, raise your right hand,” the judge said, administering the oath to Huang, who had difficulty at times communicating with the judge.

“Are you able to read and write and understand English?” Lawrence asked.

“Most of it,” Huang replied.

Huang was indicted first in Minnesota, alleged to have obtained trade secrets of a food product from Cargill Inc. He also was indicted in Indiana and was alleged to have passed on information about a Dow Agro organic pesticide.

The government said the trade secrets and biological material were given to Hunan Normal University in China.

Some of that information allegedly was passed on to a person who attended a technical university in Dresden, Germany.

Justice Department spokesman Tim Horty said Dow invested $300 million developing information allegedly stolen, but the plea agreement values the total losses from Huang's conduct at $7 million to $20 million.

FBI agent Matthew Stahl took the stand in court Tuesday, testifying that German authorities, through an agreement signed in 2009, helped U.S. law enforcement officials obtain electronic records and biological materials in Germany.

Huang was indicted last year on 12 counts of theft and attempted theft of trade secrets to benefit a foreign government or instrumentality, along with transportation of stolen property.

The case was brought under the Economic Espionage Act, passed in 1996 after the U.S. realized China and other countries were targeting private businesses as part of their spy strategies.

Lawrence explained to Huang that he had a right to seek a trial, instead of agreeing to plead guilty.  

Federal prosecutors recommended that the judge accept the plea agreement, calling Huang a “brilliant scientist” in search of the American dream. But they said Huang nevertheless committed “subterfuge” and a “clandestine operation on behalf of the People’s Republic of China.”

Lawrence said he wanted companies victimized by the theft to have an opportunity to speak at the upcoming sentencing hearing. Huang could be asked to make restitution.

Unless other information surfaces, the plea should conclude the government’s case against Huang, U.S. Attorney Joseph Hogsett said after the hearing.
As IBJ reported in September 2010, Huang's story reads like a spy novel.

Dow AgroSciences is a subsidiary of Midland, Mich.-based Dow Chemical Co.

Huang is a Canadian citizen with permanent U.S. resident status.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

  2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

  3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

  4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

  5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.