Fishers city election draws political vets, but not Faultless

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fishers residents will elect their first mayor this year, and six Republicans are vying to lead the fast-growing suburb that officially will become a city on Jan. 1.

Mayoral candidates include longtime Town Council President Walt Kelly, current Town Manager Scott Fadness, first-term Town Council member Renee Cox, and Marvin Scott, who has run unsuccessfully for the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate. Also in the race are political newcomers Maurice Heitzman and Elaine Viskant.

No Democrats entered the mayoral race by the Feb. 7 primary-election filing deadline, but the party can appoint a candidate before the general election. Hamilton County Democratic Party chief Keith Clock said officials will "continue to recruit candidates" until the summer deadline fill vacancies on the ballot.

There's another noticeable absence on the candidate list released by the Hamilton County elections office: 19-year Town Council member Scott Faultless has not filed to run for any office, including a seat on the soon-to-be-formed City Council.

Faultless, who served as council president for more than a decade, told IBJ on Monday that he is sitting out the upcoming election for personal reasons.

He didn't rule out a return to politics in the future, but said he is satisfied with the progress Fishers has made in the past two decades.

"I hope that people can say there's been an improvement, that the town is better now than it was," he said.

Voters choose partisan candidates for mayor, city council and city clerk in the May 2014 primary—typically the most-contentious election in the overwhelmingly Republican community—and return to the polls in November.

The winners will take office Jan. 1. Almost immediately, they’ll have to decide whether to run again. Another election is scheduled for 2015 to get Fishers on the state’s regular municipal election schedule.

With the exception of Cox and Faultless, all the current Town Council members are running for a seat on the new, nine-person City Council. Six will be elected from geographic districts, and three will be chosen from a field of at-large candidates.

Council President John Weingardt has no primary opponent in his south-central district, but he will face Democrat Greg Purvis on the November ballot.

Vice President Pete Peterson is unopposed in the southeast district.

Here’s a rundown of candidates in the other council races:

Southwest district: Incumbent David George will face Bill Brown in the primary; Democrat Justin Kilgore also is running.

Northwest district: Incumbent Mike Colby will face Selina Stoller in the primary; Democrat Kent Nelson also is running.

North-central district: Republicans Georgia Brown and Eric Moeller will face off in May.

Northeast district: Incumbent Stuart Easley is facing GOP opposition from former Greenfield Mayor Brad DeReamer, Fall Creek Township board member Ed Offerman, and Chad Garrard.

At-large: Republicans Rich Block, Todd Bracken, Cecilia Coble, Jeff Heinzmann, Jason W. Meyer and Todd Zimmerman are vying for three seats.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.